Hello Jeremy,
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 01:52:04 -0500 Jeremy Cowgar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone have some example sites run w/Spiffy? How robust is Spiffy? I have a
> site that is currently handling ~ 2.5 million hits/mo, or on average 51 a
> second. It's currently backed by MySQL and is using
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 11:41:41AM -0500, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
> Quoting Peter Bex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > So I can't definitely recommend Spiffy based on hard numbers. However, my
> > gut feeling says it's capable of serving up what you describe. It would be
> > interesting to see how well it h
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 11:41:41AM -0500, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
> Quoting Peter Bex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > So I can't definitely recommend Spiffy based on hard numbers. However, my
> > gut feeling says it's capable of serving up what you describe. It would be
> > interesting to see how well it h
Quoting Peter Bex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So I can't definitely recommend Spiffy based on hard numbers. However, my
> gut feeling says it's capable of serving up what you describe. It would be
> interesting to see how well it holds up on a bigger server. If you do
> decide to try it out, please r
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 01:52:04AM -0500, Jeremy Cowgar wrote:
> Anyone have some example sites run w/Spiffy? How robust is Spiffy? I have a
> site that is currently handling ~ 2.5 million hits/mo, or on average 51 a
> second. It's currently backed by MySQL and is using almost no cache due to
> poo
Anyone have some example sites run w/Spiffy? How robust is Spiffy? I have a
site that is currently handling ~ 2.5 million hits/mo, or on average 51 a
second. It's currently backed by MySQL and is using almost no cache due to
poor design (not totally my fault).
It's a long story, but the current co
