No problem. The fix is now in args 1.4.4.
On Aug 5, 2013, at 21:54, Jonathan Chan j...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Sorry for the delayed reply - I missed your message for some reason. The
patch does work! Thanks for the help and for the useful egg.
--
Jonathan Chan
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013, at 06:43
Sorry for the delayed reply - I missed your message for some reason. The
patch does work! Thanks for the help and for the useful egg.
--
Jonathan Chan
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013, at 06:43 AM, Jim Ursetto wrote:
Did you try my patch? You don't have to rewrite anything, it's a bug in
the args egg.
Thank you for the help! This is definitely a very interesting language
to learn.
On 08/03/2013 09:06 AM, John Cowan wrote:
Jonathan Chan scripsit:
Here is the smallest amount of args-using Chicken that will cause the
problem:
(define-syntax test
(syntax-rules ()
((test)
(begin
Did you try my patch? You don't have to rewrite anything, it's a bug in the
args egg.
On Aug 4, 2013, at 2:13 AM, Jonathan Chan j...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Thank you for the help! This is definitely a very interesting language to
learn.
On 08/03/2013 09:06 AM, John Cowan wrote:
Jonathan
Hello all,
First off, I am very new to Chicken. I recently tried using the args egg
and wrote a syntax-rules macro to let me clarify a bunch of copy-paste
declarations, but seem to be running into some strange problem where
numbers are appended to the names of certain symbols.
Here is the
This patch to the args egg should fix things -- could you try it?
Jim
Index: args.scm
===
--- args.scm(revision 29488)
+++ args.scm(working copy)
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@
)
(let* ((srfi37-names (map (lambda
