On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 01:38:19AM +0100, Thomas Chust wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 18:23 -0600, Alan Post wrote:
[...]
(pretty-print (let ((s (amb 0 1 2))) (amb-collect s)))
[...]
produces:
[...]
(0)
[...]
Hello,
to me this behaviour looks correct. amb-collect is supposed
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Alan Post alanp...@sunflowerriver.orgwrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 01:38:19AM +0100, Thomas Chust wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 18:23 -0600, Alan Post wrote:
[...]
(pretty-print (let ((s (amb 0 1 2))) (amb-collect s)))
[...]
produces:
[...]
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 09:18:29AM -0700, Matt Welland wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Alan Post
[1]alanp...@sunflowerriver.org wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 01:38:19AM +0100, Thomas Chust wrote:
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 18:23 -0600, Alan Post wrote:
[...]
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:05:19PM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
On Mar 19 2012, Alan Post wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 09:18:29AM -0700, Matt Welland wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:55 AM, Alan Post
A local-to-me ecologist is interested in sitting down and
brainstorming, I hope
I'm confused by the following behavior in the amb egg:
(require-extension extras amb)
(pretty-print (amb-collect (amb 0 1 2)))
(pretty-print (let ((s (amb 0 1 2))) (amb-collect s)))
(exit)
produces:
(0 1 2)
(0)
I would expect both forms to produce (0 1 2).
What am I missing? I'm
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 18:23 -0600, Alan Post wrote:
[...]
(pretty-print (let ((s (amb 0 1 2))) (amb-collect s)))
[...]
produces:
[...]
(0)
[...]
Hello,
to me this behaviour looks correct. amb-collect is supposed to collect
all the different values its argument can take on, but in your
Alan Post scripsit:
(pretty-print (let ((s (amb 0 1 2))) (amb-collect s)))
You're assuming that the result of amb is an amb object that you
can bind to a variable, but that's not how amb works. It provides
a non-linear flow of control in the evaluation of its arguments, but
once it
