I can't resist to propose another minor code improvement.
For this one I even recall where I learned the trick: early in my CS
studies, we been taken to analyse how we could do better than the
straight forward implementation of double linked lists.
(Which would be the implementation of e.g., the
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 01:41:03PM +0200, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
I can't resist to propose another minor code improvement.
For this one I even recall where I learned the trick: early in my CS
studies, we been taken to analyse how we could do better than the
straight forward
Jörg F. Wittenberger scripsit:
One consideration is: as it is now, it works quite well. But I see
more simplifications ahead. Maybe it's the best to integrate the well
tested state of affairs now and have me tampering later.
Yes, please take this alternative. Nothing should get integrated