Re: [Chicken-users] bit-set? seems to be buggy

On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 12:12:57PM +0100, obscurolocon...@googlemail.com wrote: > 2012/1/6 Peter Bex : > > > > Chicken's bit-set? is not from SRFI-60.  It has a swapped argument order. > > See the manual: > > http://api.call-cc.org/doc/library/bit-set%3F > > > > (by the way, it would be nice if its

Re: [Chicken-users] bit-set? seems to be buggy

2012/1/6 Peter Bex : > > Chicken's bit-set? is not from SRFI-60.  It has a swapped argument order. > See the manual: > http://api.call-cc.org/doc/library/bit-set%3F > > (by the way, it would be nice if its author could put the docs in a wiki >  page so that api.call-cc.org can pick up on it) It is

Re: [Chicken-users] bit-set? seems to be buggy

On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 11:38:11AM +0100, obscurolocon...@googlemail.com wrote: > Gambit: > $ gsi -e '(display (bit-set? 1 2))(newline)' > #t > > Chicken: > $ csi -e '(display (bit-set? 1 2))(newline)' > #f > Chicken's bit-set? is not from SRFI-60. It has a swapped argument order. See the manua

[Chicken-users] bit-set? seems to be buggy

Gambit: $ gsi -e '(display (bit-set? 1 2))(newline)' #t Chicken: $ csi -e '(display (bit-set? 1 2))(newline)' #f $ csi -v CHICKEN (c)2008-2011 The Chicken Team (c)2000-2007 Felix L. Winkelmann Version 4.7.0.3-st linux-unix-gnu-x86-64 [ 64bit manyargs dload ptables ] compiled 2011-12-11 on sn-e06