Am Freitag, den 10.10.2008, 11:19 -0700 schrieb Elf:
i'd recommend the r5rs primitive 'write' instead of 'display', 'printf', etc,
if you want the external representation of your code. :)
That's what would have recommended until a few weeks ago, when I found
write to be the source of an
On Sat, 11 Oct 2008, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
Am Freitag, den 10.10.2008, 11:19 -0700 schrieb Elf:
i'd recommend the r5rs primitive 'write' instead of 'display', 'printf', etc,
if you want the external representation of your code. :)
That's what would have recommended until a few weeks
Hello,
I've put the following in a file and compiled it with chicken:
(begin
(display (command-line-arguments))
(exit))
when I run this with:
test.exe 1 argument
I get:
(1 argument)
But this looks like a list of 2 arguments where I expected 1. Am I
missing something?
(I'm on windows XP,
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 04:04:13PM +0200, Wietse Jacobs wrote:
Hello,
I've put the following in a file and compiled it with chicken:
(begin
(display (command-line-arguments))
(exit))
when I run this with:
test.exe 1 argument
I get:
(1 argument)
But this looks like a list of 2
Hi Wietse
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 16:04:13 +0200 Wietse Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've put the following in a file and compiled it with chicken:
(begin
(display (command-line-arguments))
(exit))
when I run this with:
test.exe 1 argument
I get:
(1 argument)
But this looks
2008/10/10 Peter Bex [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 04:04:13PM +0200, Wietse Jacobs wrote:
(display (command-line-arguments))
That's (kind of) a limitation of how 'display' works.
#;1 (display (list foo bar))
(foo bar)
Instead, you want:
#;2 (printf ~S (list foo bar))
(foo
i'd recommend the r5rs primitive 'write' instead of 'display', 'printf', etc,
if you want the external representation of your code. :)
-elf
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008, Wietse Jacobs wrote:
2008/10/10 Peter Bex [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 04:04:13PM +0200, Wietse Jacobs wrote:
