From: Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] for-each should signal error if given a non-list?
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:20:22 +0200
* Alejandro Forero Cuervo a...@freaks-unidos.net [100717 21:15]:
Could we make for-each signal an error if given some argument
Could we make for-each signal an error if given some argument (other
than the first) which is not a list?
In Chicken 3.4.0, evaluating (for-each 0 0) correctly signaled an
error:
Error: (for-each) argument is not a proper list: 0
4.5.0 seems to just silently ignore the typing error.
Could we
* Alejandro Forero Cuervo a...@freaks-unidos.net [100717 21:15]:
Could we make for-each signal an error if given some argument (other
than the first) which is not a list?
In Chicken 3.4.0, evaluating (for-each 0 0) correctly signaled an
error:
Error: (for-each) argument is not a proper
