> On Nov 21, 2018, at 11:05 AM, John Cowan wrote:
>
> Each of the :foo and foo: styles are supported by most of the 9, whereas the
> SRFI-88 style was supported by only 4. See
> https://bitbucket.org/cowan/r7rs-wg1-infra/src/default/KeywordSyntax.md for
> details
>
For your information,
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 1:35 AM Sven Hartrumpf wrote:
But my argument is about interoperability between implementations, e.g.
> reading with Scheme implementation A code written by Scheme implementation
> B.
>
I fear that is a lost cause. Of 22 Schemes that I tested, only 8 support
keywords at
John Cowan wrote on 2018-11-20 16:56:
> IMO, `write` should not respect `keyword-style` but use the invariant
> syntax `#:foo` for keywords, as that always works, whereas `foo:`
> and `:foo` don't. The whole point of `write` is that you can reread
> the output with `read` and get something that
Hi Sven,
On 2018-11-20 22:51, Sven Hartrumpf wrote:
> pp and write (in chicken 5) do not respect the parameter (keyword-style);
> Only display respects keyword-style.
This behaviour is intentional, for the reasons John describes.
Refer to ticket #1332 for specifics about the change:
Hi.
pp and write (in chicken 5) do not respect the parameter (keyword-style);
Only display respects keyword-style.
#;1> (import (chicken pretty-print))
; loading
/usr/local/chicken-5.0.0-x32/lib/chicken/9/chicken.pretty-print.import.so ...
#;2> (keyword-style)
#:suffix
#;3> (write '(arg1: 1))
