Thanks, Toby. Egg is updated.
cheers,
felix
On 10/22/06, Toby Butzon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On 10/20/06, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another useful thing would be not to save duplicate lines, but it
requires marginally more work than just writing this message.
I think this
On 10/20/06, Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone please patch the readline egg:
335c335
if (gnu_readline_buf != NULL)
---
if (gnu_readline_buf != NULL *gnu_readline_buf != '\0')
Done. Thanks.
cheers,
felix
--
http://galinha.ucpel.tche.br:8081/blog/blog.ssp
Someone please patch the readline egg:
335c335
if (gnu_readline_buf != NULL)
---
if (gnu_readline_buf != NULL *gnu_readline_buf != '\0')
to avoid blank lines being saved to history. Is anyone using the readline egg?
Another useful thing would be not to save duplicate lines, but
Hello Dan,
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 23:55:22 -0700 (PDT) Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone using the readline egg?
I use it quite frequently when I want to quickly test something
simple.
Another useful thing would be not to save duplicate lines, but it
requires marginally more work than
Another useful thing would be not to save duplicate lines, but it
requires marginally more work than just writing this message.
I think this could be a configuration option like, if I remember
correctly, it is in shells like GNU Bash.
Right, but
(i) this feature needs to be programmed into
