Thank you Mario,
Should be fixed now.
Best
/Jörg
On Aug 20 2018, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
Hi Jörg,
On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 09:21:42 +0200 Mario Domenech Goulart
wrote:
On 17 Aug 2018 20:40:02 +0200 Jörg F. Wittenberger
wrote:
there is an srfi-34 egg here
Hi Jörg,
On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 09:21:42 +0200 Mario Domenech Goulart
wrote:
> On 17 Aug 2018 20:40:02 +0200 Jörg F. Wittenberger
> wrote:
>
>> there is an srfi-34 egg here
>>
>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/0-8-15/srfi-34/master/srfi-34.release-info
>>
>> https://github.com/0-8-15/srfi-34
On 17 Aug 2018 20:40:02 +0200 Jörg F. Wittenberger
wrote:
> there is an srfi-34 egg here
>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/0-8-15/srfi-34/master/srfi-34.release-info
>
> https://github.com/0-8-15/srfi-34
>
> which compiles for me with both chicken 4 and chicken 5.
>
> Could go to the coop
there is an srfi-34 egg here
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/0-8-15/srfi-34/master/srfi-34.release-info
https://github.com/0-8-15/srfi-34
which compiles for me with both chicken 4 and chicken 5.
Could go to the coop if it is done well.
Best
/Jörg
Hi Ben et al,
I found it not paying nice (possibly not playing nice _anymore_) with the
native exceptions chicken provides.
The fix is simple, add these two lines to srfi-34 module:
(use (prefix srfi-34 s34:))
(mutate-procedure!
with-exception-handler
(lambda (forget-it)
Hello,
I attach two implementations of srfi-34's guard syntax. (Depending
only of srfi-18; no additional procedures.)
I'd like to ask Elf, or whoever can do so and cares, to update the egg
(since the version there is broken).
However I'm left with a question: which version would one prefer?
