Thanks Peter and Jim, that makes a lot of sense. Even if they never get
homogenized, I'm glad the sxml tools exist, and the Chicken division
definitely helps.
I guess my question boils down to what am I missing – do the low-level
functions only serve for writing the top-level ones, or do they
I know this is slightly off-topic. Related so far only to SXML, XSLT and
chicken, because it's written in Chicken and implements and uses some
XSLT and SXML (and SRFI-110 a.k.a. sweet expressions - a python like
form to write LISP) quite a lot. So maybe it's helpful source to copy
from in it.
I've got a couple of blog posts on SXML and namespaces, if you haven't already
seen them:
http://3e8.org/blog/2010/07/30/namespaces-in-sxml-part-1/
http://3e8.org/blog/2010/07/31/namespaces-in-sxml-part-2/
http://3e8.org/blog/2010/08/01/default-namespaces-in-sxml/
but these are higher-level and
Hello,
Since this is my first post, let me say how happy I've been since I
discovered Chicken: thanks everyone for creating such a well-thought-out
environment.
I've got a general question about the sxml tools. I've been using the
top-level functions for a while now, for tasks I *could* do in
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 08:54:02PM +0200, Nathaniel Rudavsky-Brody wrote:
Hello,
Since this is my first post, let me say how happy I've been since I
discovered Chicken: thanks everyone for creating such a well-thought-out
environment.
Hi Nathaniel, and welcome to the coop :)
I've got a
