* Michael Greenly michaelgree...@logic-refinery.com [131207 20:23]:
I've been trying to learn how threads work but have become a bit stumped by
this example:
https://gist.github.com/mgreenly/7847072#file-graceful-scm
My assumption is that the thread would be started and recurs until done
Strange: I can NOT reproduce this problem.
Which chicken and which OS are you on?
Am 07.12.2013 20:23, schrieb Michael Greenly:
I've been trying to learn how threads work but have become a bit
stumped by this example:
https://gist.github.com/mgreenly/7847072#file-graceful-scm
My assumption
Hi,
I've been trying to learn how threads work but have become a bit stumped
by this example:
https://gist.github.com/mgreenly/7847072#file-graceful-scm
Also, beware bug #1067 when using 'done' like this in compiled code:
http://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/1067
Regards,
@ndy
--
On 07/12/13 19:23, Michael Greenly wrote:
I've been trying to learn how threads work but have become a bit stumped
by this example:
https://gist.github.com/mgreenly/7847072#file-graceful-scm
My assumption is that the thread would be started and recurs until done
becomes false at which
I've been trying to learn how threads work but have become a bit stumped by
this example:
https://gist.github.com/mgreenly/7847072#file-graceful-scm
My assumption is that the thread would be started and recurs until done
becomes false at which time that thread would exit cleanly and allow the
Hi Michael,
* Michael Greenly michaelgree...@logic-refinery.com [131207 20:23]:
My assumption is that the thread would be started and recurs until done
becomes false at which time that thread would exit cleanly and allow the
join in the primary thread to continue.
The 'done' flag only
* Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org [131207 21:11]:
Hi Michael,
* Michael Greenly michaelgree...@logic-refinery.com [131207 20:23]:
My assumption is that the thread would be started and recurs until done
becomes false at which time that thread would exit cleanly and allow the
join
Fortunately I can't imagine I would ever actual use thread-sleep! like
this, rather the thread would be waiting on I/O, so it appears I have no
obstacles.
Thank you for taking the time to look at it.
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.orgwrote:
* Christian