Hi Vok,
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 16:47:03 +0100 Vok Vojwo cev...@gmail.com wrote:
The documentation of the sxpath egg describes the sxml:sxml-xml
function. But when I try to call it, I get an error:
csi -R sxpath -e (display (sxml:sxml-xml '()))
Error: unbound variable: sxml:sxml-xml
* Vok Vojwo cev...@gmail.com [111207 16:47]:
The documentation of the sxpath egg describes the sxml:sxml-xml
function. But when I try to call it, I get an error:
csi -R sxpath -e (display (sxml:sxml-xml '()))
Error: unbound variable: sxml:sxml-xml
It should be part of sxpath-lolevel. The
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 04:47:03PM +0100, Vok Vojwo wrote:
The documentation of the sxpath egg describes the sxml:sxml-xml
function. But when I try to call it, I get an error:
It's mentioned under the heading sxpath-lolevel. This is a separate
module that you need to load.
csi -R sxpath -e
2011/12/7 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl:
Try this instead:
csi -R sxpath-lolevel -e (print (sxml:sxml-xml '()))
Thanks. This works but not as expected ;-)
I was looking for the srl:sxml-xml function:
http://modis.ispras.ru/Lizorkin/Apidoc/index.html#docfunc15826
Is it also available?
2011/12/7 Vok Vojwo cev...@gmail.com:
I was looking for the srl:sxml-xml function:
http://modis.ispras.ru/Lizorkin/Apidoc/index.html#docfunc15826
I got it. I had to include sxml-tools/serializer.scm in
sxpath-lolevel.scm. After that it is possible to export srl:sxml-xml.
And it seems to work:
* Vok Vojwo cev...@gmail.com [111207 17:32]:
2011/12/7 Vok Vojwo cev...@gmail.com:
I was looking for the srl:sxml-xml function:
http://modis.ispras.ru/Lizorkin/Apidoc/index.html#docfunc15826
I got it. I had to include sxml-tools/serializer.scm in
sxpath-lolevel.scm. After that it is
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 05:35:37PM +0100, Christian Kellermann wrote:
Why is it not included if it is there?
Or why is there an sxml-serializer egg if the code is already part of
the SSAX libs, which is part of the sxpath egg?
As I understood the egg is just a wrapper around the
On Dec 7, 2011, at 10:41 AM, Peter Bex wrote:
Actually, the main reason is that SSAX is a horrible mess which has
many completely unrelated procedures all mixed together.
There are several egg that provide different sets of procedures
from the SSAX project. Most eggs include all files from
2011/12/7 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl:
Actually, the main reason is that SSAX is a horrible mess which has
many completely unrelated procedures all mixed together.
There are several egg that provide different sets of procedures
from the SSAX project. Most eggs include all files from the
2011/12/7 Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com:
Other ways were to regularize and improve some of the identifier names, make
things more idiomatic, and in sxml-serializer's case, add some feature
enhancements.
Where is the improvement? Writing sxml-serializer instead of
srl:sxml-xml does not
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Vok Vojwo cev...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/12/7 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl:
Actually, the main reason is that SSAX is a horrible mess which has
many completely unrelated procedures all mixed together.
There are several egg that provide different sets of
11 matches
Mail list logo
