On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 2:59 AM Tim via wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> Matt Welland writes:
> > Supporting glob patterns at any level would be handy. I started to
> > implement something which I've included below but before I complete it:
>
> I like this idea too. Just one thing: would it be possible to
Hi Matt,
Matt Welland writes:
> Supporting glob patterns at any level would be handy. I started to
> implement something which I've included below but before I complete it:
I like this idea too. Just one thing: would it be possible to use the
double-asterisk ** instead of a single * to
On 2019-11-28 8:38, Kristian Lein-Mathisen wrote:
> I may be missing the point here, but is'nt it just easier to use find-files?
I think there are situations where one is more natural than the other.
find-files is strictly more powerful, but it's not as concise or
readable for many use cases so
I may be missing the point here, but is'nt it just easier to use find-files?
http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/5/Module%20(chicken%20file)#find-files
K.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019, 23:32 Evan Hanson wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> This would be nice indeed, I've also found myself wanting this feature
> before. I
Hi Matt,
This would be nice indeed, I've also found myself wanting this feature
before. I don't know of an existing solution, but I think it would be
best if we made it "just work" with the existing glob procedure.
I've created a ticket for that: https://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/1657
Cheers,
Improved version:
(define (multi-glob pathspec)
(let* ((path-parts (intersperse (string-split pathspec "/" #t) "/")))
(if (null? path-parts)
'()
(let loop ((parts (cdr path-parts))
(result (let ((p (car path-parts)))
(if (string=? p "")
'("/")
(glob (car path-parts))
(if (null?
Supporting glob patterns at any level would be handy. I started to
implement something which I've included below but before I complete it:
1. Is there a multi-level glob implementation in some other egg? The glob
that comes with posix only handles the pattern in the top level. I didn't
find
