Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

2020-11-09 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 01:26:33 +0100 Vasilij Schneidermann wrote: > SRFI-146 is ready for inclusion as well: > https://depp.brause.cc/srfi-146/srfi-146.release-info Thanks! Your egg has been added to the coop. All the best. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario

Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

2020-11-09 Thread Vasilij Schneidermann
SRFI-146 is ready for inclusion as well: https://depp.brause.cc/srfi-146/srfi-146.release-info Vasilij signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

2020-11-09 Thread John Cowan
FWIW, SRFI 158 is fully downwardly compatible. On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 1:40 PM Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: > Hi Jeremy, > > On Mon, 09 Nov 2020 10:13:19 -0700 Jeremy Steward > wrote: > > > Ooh boy, is SRFI 158 ready to go? > > > > If that's the case, should we deprecate / remove SRFI 121 from

Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

2020-11-09 Thread Jeremy Steward
>> SRFI-121 is only in the C4 coop and likewise SRFI-158 only in the C5 >> one, so I don't see any need for removal. A deprecation notice could >be >> added for SRFI-121 to the C4 wiki page. If you insist you could add >a >> stub C5 wiki page pointing out the existence of SRFI-158, much like

Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

2020-11-09 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Jeremy, On Mon, 09 Nov 2020 10:13:19 -0700 Jeremy Steward wrote: > Ooh boy, is SRFI 158 ready to go? > > If that's the case, should we deprecate / remove SRFI 121 from the coop? > > I am currently the maintainer, but am happy to focus efforts on 158 over 121. Thanks for following up on

Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

2020-11-09 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 18:04:30 +0100 Vasilij Schneidermann wrote: > SRFI-158 (Generators) is ready as well: > https://depp.brause.cc/srfi-158/srfi-158.release-info Thanks again. It's been added as well. All the best. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario

Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

2020-11-09 Thread noosphere
A couple more considerations to take in to account: First, even if both eggs were available for Chicken 5, is 158 fully backwards compatible with 121? If not, then it might not be the best idea to remove 121. Second, I think it's a good idea for Chicken to have more eggs rather than less

Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

2020-11-09 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 12:58:37 +0100 Vasilij Schneidermann wrote: > I've implemented SRFI-145 in terms of the existing assert macro. > `salmonella` and `test-new-egg` run fine with > . A wiki page is > ready to be submitted after inclusion

Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

2020-11-09 Thread Vasilij Schneidermann
Hello Jeremy, > If that's the case, should we deprecate / remove SRFI 121 from the coop? SRFI-121 is only in the C4 coop and likewise SRFI-158 only in the C5 one, so I don't see any need for removal. A deprecation notice could be added for SRFI-121 to the C4 wiki page. If you insist you could

Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

2020-11-09 Thread Jeremy Steward
Ooh boy, is SRFI 158 ready to go? If that's the case, should we deprecate / remove SRFI 121 from the coop? I am currently the maintainer, but am happy to focus efforts on 158 over 121. -- Jeremy Steward

Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

2020-11-09 Thread Vasilij Schneidermann
Hello again, SRFI-158 (Generators) is ready as well: https://depp.brause.cc/srfi-158/srfi-158.release-info Vasilij signature.asc Description: PGP signature

New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

2020-11-09 Thread Vasilij Schneidermann
Hello everyone, I've implemented SRFI-145 in terms of the existing assert macro. `salmonella` and `test-new-egg` run fine with . A wiki page is ready to be submitted after inclusion into the coop. This egg is part of an effort to get