Hi Sören,
On Sat, 08 Aug 2020 18:58:35 +0200 Sören Tempel
wrote:
> Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
>
>> My only remark would be regarding the license, which AFAIK should be
>> MIT. John Cowan would be able to clarify that.
>
> I went through the license comments in these files and bitwise-60.sc
Despite little variations in wording, I think that the best thing for
Chicken purposes is to say that the whole egg is MIT.
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 12:59 PM Sören Tempel
wrote:
> Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
> > Hi Sören,
>
> Hello Mario,
>
> > My only remark would be regarding the license, whi
Mario Domenech Goulart wrote:
> Hi Sören,
Hello Mario,
> My only remark would be regarding the license, which AFAIK should be
> MIT. John Cowan would be able to clarify that.
I went through the license comments in these files and bitwise-60.scm
and bitwise-core.scm have a license which is iden
Hi Sören,
On Sat, 08 Aug 2020 11:43:59 +0200 Sören Tempel
wrote:
> I created an egg for SRFI-151. This is my first egg, I tried to
> carefully follow the instruction on the wiki regarding the creation and
> publishing process. According to the wiki page on publishing eggs [1],
> the egg has to
Hello,
I created an egg for SRFI-151. This is my first egg, I tried to
carefully follow the instruction on the wiki regarding the creation and
publishing process. According to the wiki page on publishing eggs [1],
the egg has to be added to the egg-locations file in subversion. I was
hoping my egg