check out the clojurian egg too: http://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/4/clojurian
martin
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Sungjin Chun chu...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you. Though I'm not sure on my code is in good style, I managed to
convert my
code to chicken scheme like this;
(set-read-syntax!
Thank you, what I miss from clojure is its uniform or homoiconic(?) style of
sequence accessing; so one does not have to check current sequence is whether
list or vector or others. I'd like to create macro or something for this. :-)
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 7, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Martin
NeXT chu...@gmail.com writes:
Thank you, what I miss from clojure is its uniform or homoiconic(?)
style of sequence accessing; so one does not have to check current
sequence is whether list or vector or others. I'd like to create macro
or something for this. :-)
This is called a generic
Wow, thank you.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 7, 2014, at 10:03 PM, Moritz Heidkamp mor...@twoticketsplease.de
wrote:
NeXT chu...@gmail.com writes:
Thank you, what I miss from clojure is its uniform or homoiconic(?)
style of sequence accessing; so one does not have to check current
On Fri, 7 Nov 2014, Moritz Heidkamp wrote:
NeXT chu...@gmail.com writes:
Thank you, what I miss from clojure is its uniform or homoiconic(?)
style of sequence accessing; so one does not have to check current
sequence is whether list or vector or others. I'd like to create macro
or something
