Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

SRFI-146 is ready for inclusion as well: https://depp.brause.cc/srfi-146/srfi-146.release-info Vasilij signature.asc Description: PGP signature

New egg: SRFI-197: Pipeline Operators

I would like to submit a new egg for publication: SRFI-197: Pipeline Operators The documentation is here: [1] The release-info is here: [2] test-new-egg has given it a clean bill of health. --Sergey [1] - https://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/srfi-197 [2] -

Re: New egg: SRFI-197: Pipeline Operators

On Mon, 09 Nov 2020 19:44:48 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit a new egg for publication: > > SRFI-197: Pipeline Operators > > The documentation is here: [1] > > The release-info is here: [2] > > test-new-egg has given it a clean bill of health. > > --Sergey > > > [1] -

Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 01:26:33 +0100 Vasilij Schneidermann wrote: > SRFI-146 is ready for inclusion as well: > https://depp.brause.cc/srfi-146/srfi-146.release-info Thanks! Your egg has been added to the coop. All the best. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario

New egg: SRFI-196: Range Objects

I would like to submit for publication SRFI-196: Range Objects The documentation is here: [1] The release-info is here: [2] test-new-egg gives it a clean bill of health --Sergey [1] - https://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/srfi-196 [2] -

Re: New egg: SRFI-196: Range Objects

On Mon, 09 Nov 2020 17:38:42 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit for publication SRFI-196: Range Objects > > The documentation is here: [1] > > The release-info is here: [2] > > test-new-egg gives it a clean bill of health > > --Sergey > > [1] -

Eggs in Progress

Per a discussion on #chicken, I've created an "Eggs in Progress" wiki page.[1] So far it's just me working on SRFI-196 on there, but I encourage any egg developer to make an entry on this page so that we don't unknowingly wind up working on the same thing and duplicating effort. --Sergey [1]

Re: SRFI-38 ported from Chicken 4 to 5

On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 01:37:04 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I just ported the SRFI-38 egg from Chicken 4 to 5, and would like to > submit it for publication. > > The Chicken 5 documentation (copied verbatim from the Chicken 4 egg) is here: > [1] > > The release-info file is here: [2] > > A

Re: New egg: SRFI-45: Primitives for Expressing Iterative Lazy Algorithms

On Sat, 07 Nov 2020 18:42:14 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > With Kon Lovett's permission, I just finished porting his SRFI-45 egg to > Chicken 5, and would like to submit it for publication. > > Its documentation is here: [1] > > Its release-info is here: [2] > > and test-new-egg gave it a

New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

Hello everyone, I've implemented SRFI-145 in terms of the existing assert macro. `salmonella` and `test-new-egg` run fine with . A wiki page is ready to be submitted after inclusion into the coop. This egg is part of an effort to get

Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

Hello again, SRFI-158 (Generators) is ready as well: https://depp.brause.cc/srfi-158/srfi-158.release-info Vasilij signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

Ooh boy, is SRFI 158 ready to go? If that's the case, should we deprecate / remove SRFI 121 from the coop? I am currently the maintainer, but am happy to focus efforts on 158 over 121. -- Jeremy Steward

Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

Hello Jeremy, > If that's the case, should we deprecate / remove SRFI 121 from the coop? SRFI-121 is only in the C4 coop and likewise SRFI-158 only in the C5 one, so I don't see any need for removal. A deprecation notice could be added for SRFI-121 to the C4 wiki page. If you insist you could

Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 18:04:30 +0100 Vasilij Schneidermann wrote: > SRFI-158 (Generators) is ready as well: > https://depp.brause.cc/srfi-158/srfi-158.release-info Thanks again. It's been added as well. All the best. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario

Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

A couple more considerations to take in to account: First, even if both eggs were available for Chicken 5, is 158 fully backwards compatible with 121? If not, then it might not be the best idea to remove 121. Second, I think it's a good idea for Chicken to have more eggs rather than less

Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 12:58:37 +0100 Vasilij Schneidermann wrote: > I've implemented SRFI-145 in terms of the existing assert macro. > `salmonella` and `test-new-egg` run fine with > . A wiki page is > ready to be submitted after inclusion

Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

Hi Jeremy, On Mon, 09 Nov 2020 10:13:19 -0700 Jeremy Steward wrote: > Ooh boy, is SRFI 158 ready to go? > > If that's the case, should we deprecate / remove SRFI 121 from the coop? > > I am currently the maintainer, but am happy to focus efforts on 158 over 121. Thanks for following up on

Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

>> SRFI-121 is only in the C4 coop and likewise SRFI-158 only in the C5 >> one, so I don't see any need for removal. A deprecation notice could >be >> added for SRFI-121 to the C4 wiki page. If you insist you could add >a >> stub C5 wiki page pointing out the existence of SRFI-158, much like

Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

FWIW, SRFI 158 is fully downwardly compatible. On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 1:40 PM Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: > Hi Jeremy, > > On Mon, 09 Nov 2020 10:13:19 -0700 Jeremy Steward > wrote: > > > Ooh boy, is SRFI 158 ready to go? > > > > If that's the case, should we deprecate / remove SRFI 121 from