Alex Shinn scripsit:
There are actually many implementations for which this is an error.
Notably R6RS requires it to be an error.
Not too many outside R6RS, actually: only RScheme, SXM, SigScheme, UMB,
Dfsch, Foment, Chibi.
Schemes typically use the name `add1' for this.
This is only
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 4:03 PM, John Cowan co...@mercury.ccil.org wrote:
Alex Shinn scripsit:
There are actually many implementations for which this is an error.
Notably R6RS requires it to be an error.
Not too many outside R6RS, actually: only RScheme, SXM, SigScheme, UMB,
Dfsch,
Hi all,
I think it would be useful if csc were able to work directly from the
standard input (e.g. in case of no source files). For example:
csc -o quick_test
[paste code]
Ctrl-D
./quick_test
or
cat f.scm | preprocessor | csc
./a.out
On most Unixes you can obtain the result with /dev/stdin,
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:58:39AM -0700, ceving wrote:
Am Freitag, 8. November 2013 18:57:32 UTC+1 schrieb John Cowan:
The final draft of R7RS-small has been ratified by a unanimous vote of
the Scheme Language Steering Committee.
Hi Michele,
csc(1) will read source from standard input given the filename -.
$ csc -o quick_test -
(print 1)
^D
$ ./quick_test
1
Whether csc(1) should default to standard input when no filename is
given is a matter for debate, but that's how it's done as things are.
Alex Shinn scripsit:
That's still a lot more than provide 1+ out of the box (do any other
than Guile?).
Provide `1+` but not `add1`: MIT, Guile, SCM, XLisp, Rep, Elk, FemtoLisp,
Inlab.
Provide `add1` but not `1+`: Racket, Chicken, SISC, Vicare, IronScheme,
RScheme, SXM.
Provide both: Chez,
Hello chicken users,
Is there a way to determine, in code, whether a chicken program has been
compiled? I am thinking of something similar to:
(cond-expand
(chicken-script ... )
...but with an identifer different from chicken-script.
It is possible that I'm asking the wrong
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 11:09:24AM -0700, Christopher Collins wrote:
Hello chicken users,
Is there a way to determine, in code, whether a chicken program has been
compiled? I am thinking of something similar to:
(cond-expand
(chicken-script ... )
...but with an identifer
Hi Christopher,
On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 11:09:24 -0700 Christopher Collins
ccollins47...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a way to determine, in code, whether a chicken program has
been compiled? I am thinking of something similar to:
(cond-expand
(chicken-script ... )
...but with an identifer
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote:
There's a cond-expand identifier called compiling. See also
http://wiki.call-cc.org/man/4/Non-standard%20macros%20and%20special%20forms#cond-expand
for other identifiers that you can dispatch on with
10 matches
Mail list logo
