I support moving the download and documentation sections to the top
of the page. I always have trouble finding the link to the manual.
--Alex
On 2015-01-23 08:01, Bahman Movaqar wrote:
On 01/23/2015 07:25 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 07:17:17PM +0330, Bahman Movaqar wrote:
I
Hi, Bahman--
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Bahman Movaqar bah...@bahmanm.com wrote:
I strongly disagree with using CHICKEN for the website. Let's keep things
simple by using the right tool for the job.
I'd like to challenge that statement. As a (trying-to-be-professional)
web developer who
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Matt Gushee m...@gushee.net wrote:
These days there are some good static website generators out there, like
JBake and Jekyll, with which one can use HTML or asciidoc or Markdown to
generate a static website.
Sorry. Peter mentioned a static site generator, and
Hi, Tim and everyone--
I've been meaning to comment on this topic for some time, but I am
somewhat afraid to express my opinions on this list (I hasten to add
that that has nothing to do with anyone's behavior here - just my own
feeling of being hopelessly outclassed in this community. Plus the
Hi Tim,
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:24:18 +0900 Tim van der Linden t...@shisaa.jp wrote:
In the recent light of visual changes to the wiki, I have picked up an
old(er) idea to have my go at a redesign of the homepage (landing
page, front page, the-first-page, etc...).
I, for one, find our
Hi All
Forgive me for skipping out of the running Homepage design proposal thread with
top posting a new message. I simply want to distill the great comments I got so
far (thanks everyone!) on the first rough draft of the homepage, so we can keep
all the information together.
Let me run over
Yeah, that makes sense. I guess we're stuck with a server-side solution
unless we can get Chicken running on this little emulator
http://bellard.org/jslinux/. repl.it may be of inspiration!
Thanks,
K.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Yaroslav Tsarko eriktsa...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Kristian,
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 07:17:17PM +0330, Bahman Movaqar wrote:
I strongly disagree with using CHICKEN for the website. Let's keep
things simple by using the right tool for the job.
I think you're mixing up two things. One is the tool to generate the
website and the other is the online try
On 01/23/2015 07:25 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 07:17:17PM +0330, Bahman Movaqar wrote:
I strongly disagree with using CHICKEN for the website. Let's keep
things simple by using the right tool for the job.
I think you're mixing up two things. One is the tool to generate the
I strongly disagree with using CHICKEN for the website. Let's keep
things simple by using the right tool for the job.
These days there are some good static website generators out there, like
JBake and Jekyll, with which one can use HTML or asciidoc or Markdown to
generate a static website.
10 matches
Mail list logo