Re: [Chicken-users] Distributed-concurrent computing: If Erlang is a 10. . .

Hello Lawrence, I can only speak from my experiences with Chicken and MPI: it was very easy to call the MPI primitives using the Chicken FFI functionality and write code for distributed point distance queries on a cluster with up to 512 MPI processes. All communication was done with vectors of

Re: [Chicken-users] Distributed-concurrent computing: If Erlang is a 10. . .

Perhaps you could motivate regarding which Erlang features you find desirable? -Dan Lawrence Bottorff writes: > . . . where might Chicken be concerning distributed-concurrent programming? > How close to Erlang's perfect 10 can you get with Chicken. Of course if > Chicken is

Re: [Chicken-users] Distributed-concurrent computing: If Erlang is a 10. . .

Yes, thanks for all the good info. Sorry I didn't realize termite is a part of chicken. Are there any tutorial/examples of termite chicken? i found what seems to be a very old paper: http://scheme2006.cs.uchicago.edu/09-germain.pdf On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Ivan Raikov

[Chicken-users] Distributed-concurrent computing: If Erlang is a 10. . .

. . . where might Chicken be concerning distributed-concurrent programming? How close to Erlang's perfect 10 can you get with Chicken. Of course if Chicken is even better than a 10, let me hear about it. LB ___ Chicken-users mailing list