On 5/25/21 19:28, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
Building, testing, and installing all worked out of the box, but I got
these two warnings while compiling (in red even though they're warnings):
[...]
Hm, I have no idea, but I noticed a couple of suspicious warnings. In fact,
the code
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 1:42 PM wrote:
>
>
> (modules species (species ui))
>
> declares 2 modules, I"m not sure chicken-install can detect that the extension
> consists of 2 files, with one module for each.
>
Does this mean that extensions are not supposed to be composed of more
than one
> Exactly what I was looking for!
Feedback is welcome. Should you experience any problems, don't hesitate to
report them.
felix
> Building, testing, and installing all worked out of the box, but I got
> these two warnings while compiling (in red even though they're warnings):
>
>[...]
Hm, I have no idea, but I noticed a couple of suspicious warnings. In fact,
the code doesn't even compile without "-w", which may indicate
On 5/18/21 11:29, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com wrote:
Hi!
This is to announce the "mdh" egg, an interface to the C++ API of O'Kane's
MUMPS database. The concepts behind it were presented by Luke at the
CHICKEN Coding Jam and produced quite some interest. MDH is a very
easy to use
Exactly what I was looking for!
--
Arnaud Bailly - @dr_c0d3
On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 7:29 PM wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> A first version of "csm" is available, a build system for CHICKEN Scheme
> programs:
>
> http://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/csm
>
> Assuming a small set of conventions, this tool can
Hi!
A first version of "csm" is available, a build system for CHICKEN Scheme
programs:
http://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/csm
Assuming a small set of conventions, this tool can infer dependencies and
necessary
command-line options for a set of source files written in CHICKEN or R7RS
Scheme.
> I have tried removing one of the 2 modules declared in the .egg but I
> have the same problem. When I remove the
> (species ui) import from darwin.scm it compiles and runs the tests
> but of course fails to resolve the symbol at runtime.
>
(modules species (species ui))
declares 2 modules,
> Thanks. I was wondering if this egg should be called tcl-expect, just
in case someone comes up with a pure Scheme implementation of expect
(also to make clear that the current one is actually based on Tcl).
What do you think?
It's a good idea.
I have tried removing one of the 2 modules declared in the .egg but I
have the same problem. When I remove the
(species ui) import from darwin.scm it compiles and runs the tests
but of course fails to resolve the symbol at runtime.
Could it be the name of the modules somehow clash? I tried
On Mon, 24 May 2021 19:41:01 +0300 Aydar Zarifullin wrote:
> Thank you for your notes.
>
> - Would the body of `(unless interp ...)' in `tcl-create-interp` [0]
> ever be executed?
>
> - Tcl_CreateInterp may return a null pointer (#f) for example if it fails to
> allocate memory
>
> As for
Yes, as far as I can tell it's working fine. The code in the repo
(https://gitlab.com/abailly/origin-of-species) works fine, it's only
when I start adding another module that things go wrong, at this
commit: https://gitlab.com/abailly/origin-of-species/-/tree/separate-ui-module
Thanks for your
12 matches
Mail list logo
