[Chicken-users] [ANN] salmonella 3.0.0 released

Hi, Salmonella is a tool to test CHICKEN eggs. See [1] for more information. A new version, 3.0.0, has [finally] been released. The new version supports CHICKEN 5. The release notes for the new version are here: [2]. Note that the same changes apply to salmonella for CHICKEN 4 too (see [3]).

[Chicken-users] [ANN] test-new-egg 1.0.0 released

Hi, test-new-egg is a simple commmand line tool to test new CHICKEN eggs before they are added to the official repository of eggs. For more information, see [1]. The new release adds support for CHICKEN 5. See [2] for the release notes of this version. Note that the same changes apply to test-n

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] test-new-egg 1.0.0 released

Hi Andy, On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 15:13:54 +0100 Andy Bennett wrote: >> test-new-egg is a simple commmand line tool to test new CHICKEN eggs >> before they are added to the official repository of eggs. For more >> information, see [1]. >> >> The new release adds support for CHICKEN 5. See [2] for t

[Chicken-users] Scheduled maintenance of the call-cc.org server

Hi, This week the call-cc.org server will go through some maintenance, starting today at 11:00AM UTC. Expect some periods of unavailability of services behind the following domains: * call-cc.org * www.call-cc.org * gazette.call-cc.org * paste.call-cc.org * code.call-cc.org * bugs.call-cc.org *

Re: [Chicken-users] Monad ported to Chicken 5

Hi, On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 19:07:20 + Dan Leslie wrote: > Alice Maz has kindly ported the Monad egg from Chicken 4 to 5. > > As per what I've previously done with the Allegro port[0], I'd like to have > Henrietta track the new monad.chicken-5.release-info file[1]. > > 0: https://lists.nongnu.o

Re: [Chicken-users] Debian 9 amd64 chicken-bin 4.11.0-1 cannot import from undefined module process-context

Hi David, On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 22:22:26 -0700 David Christensen wrote: > chicken-users: > > I am Chicken noob with (e-mail addresses redacted): Welcome! > 2019-09-17 22:06:21 root@tinkywinky ~ > # cat /etc/debian_version > 9.11 > > 2019-09-17 22:10:03 root@tinkywinky ~ > # uname -a > Linux tin

Re: [Chicken-users] Debian 9 amd64 chicken-bin 4.11.0-1 cannot import from undefined module process-context

On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 07:46:01 +0200 Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: >> 2019-09-17 22:06:21 root@tinkywinky ~ >> # cat /etc/debian_version >> 9.11 >> >> 2019-09-17 22:10:03 root@tinkywinky ~ >> # uname -a >> Linux tinkywinky 4.9.0-11-amd64 #1 SMP Debian

Re: [Chicken-users] Egg: chicken-update (program)

Hi Diego, On Tue, 01 Oct 2019 04:59:10 + Diego via Chicken-users wrote: > I've created a simple program to update outdated eggs. At the moment, > it only works with the default servers, as it looks through the egg > RSS sxml file to determine new versions. By default, it ignores eggs > with

Re: New SRFI-105 egg

Hi Diego, On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 06:36:48 + diego wrote: > Hi all - I've created a Chicken 5 egg for SRFI-105: curly infix > expressions. It implements both the base srfi and an (srfi-105 extra) > module that provides mixed operator and operator precedence > functionality. I've tested it with t

[ANN] Source code of all eggs as git repositories

Hi, In the past we used to have the source code of all eggs under our central subversion repository, from which users could conveniently check out the source code of the whole set of eggs. Nowadays we have the egg repositories distributed [1], which is absolutely great for egg developers, as they

Re: [ANN] Source code of all eggs as git repositories

Hi Tim, On Fri, 01 Nov 2019 13:43:09 +0100 plugd via wrote: > Mario Domenech Goulart writes: >> To fill this gap, we are making available git repositories that contain >> the source code of the whole set of eggs. See [2] for more information >> on how to clone them. >

Re: New Egg: Termbox

Hi Justin, On Tue, 24 Dec 2019 12:36:14 -0700 Justin Meiners wrote: > I just created a new egg which is bindings for the termbox library. > I have done my best to follow documentation, but this is my first egg, so I > could use you're feedback and corrections. > > Github page: > https://github

Re: New egg: web-colors

Hi John, On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 18:10:32 -0600 John Croisant wrote: > I have published a new egg, web-colors. It provides procedures to parse > and write colors in a variety of formats used in HTML/CSS: > > - Hex colors in #RGB, #RGBA, #RRGGBB, and #RRGGBBAA formats > - rgb() and rgba() colors > -

Re: New egg for 5

Hi Andrew, On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 19:34:12 -0500 Andrew Mack wrote: > I have a new egg to be added to the repo for 5. The name of the egg is > "vectr" (misspelling intentional). > > Release-info is here: > https://gitlab.com/v7x/vectr/-/raw/master/vectr.release-info I get the following error when

Re: CHICKEN 5.2.0 has been released

Hi Daniel, On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 13:47:27 -0600 Daniel Ortmann wrote: > Ideas? > > $ chicken-install -version > 5.2.0 > $ which chicken-install > /usr/local/chicken-5.2.0/bin/chicken-install > $ rm -rf ~/.cache/* > $ ll ~/.cache/ > total 0 > $ chicken-install utf8 > building utf8 > /usr/local/chic

Re: New egg for C5: tokyocabinet

Hi Sven, On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:47:30 +0100 (CET) Sven Hartrumpf wrote: > I published my first C5 egg: (a minimal set of) bindings to the tokyocabinet > library. > Currenty, this covers only reading from tch files; I will extend the egg > when I need more functions. > > I tested it with test-n

Re: New egg: macaw

Hi John, On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 21:33:21 -0500 John Croisant wrote: > I have published a new egg, macaw. It provides efficient color types, > math operations, and color space conversion. It is primarily meant for > computer graphics, data visualization, image processing, games, etc. The > examples

Re: Clucker: A Twitter API egg (Chicken 5 support added)

Hi Nick, On Tue, 5 May 2020 16:03:40 -0400 nemo1...@gmail.com wrote: > I have finally updated the clucker egg to support Chicken 5. It also > finally has proper documentation complete with a simple working > example. The egg provides access to most of Twitter's RESTful and > streaming API endpoi

Re: How to select a c compiler for chicken-install

Hi Andrew, On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 10:34:10 -0500 Andrew Eggenberger wrote: > I used a gcc from macports to build and install chicken 5.2 from > source on macosx. I'd like chicken-install to use the same c compiler > for egg installation but it defaults to the xcode c compiler. I've > tried numerous

Re: New Egg: SRFI-151

Hi Sören, On Sat, 08 Aug 2020 11:43:59 +0200 Sören Tempel wrote: > I created an egg for SRFI-151. This is my first egg, I tried to > carefully follow the instruction on the wiki regarding the creation and > publishing process. According to the wiki page on publishing eggs [1], > the egg has to

Re: New Egg: SRFI-151

Hi Sören, On Sat, 08 Aug 2020 18:58:35 +0200 Sören Tempel wrote: > Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: > >> My only remark would be regarding the license, which AFAIK should be >> MIT. John Cowan would be able to clarify that. > > I went through the license comments in th

Bitbucket has decommissioned mercurial repositories

Hi, This message is targeted at egg authors who have eggs hosted in mercurial repositories in Bitbucket. Bitbucket has decommissioned mercurial repositories [1]. It seems that starting today those repositories are no longer available. We have many mercurial repositories hosted in Bitbucket refe

Re: New egg for SRFI 193: Command line

Hi Lassi, On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 13:08:51 +0300 Lassi Kortela wrote: >> Everything seems to be in order, I’ve added the egg to the repository! :) > > Thank you very much. > > Unfortunately it has a bug (my fault): chicken-install pre-compiles it > into a .so and (import (srfi 193)) in csi loads tha

Re: New egg for SRFI 193: Command line

Hi Lassi, On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 19:35:54 +0300 Lassi Kortela wrote: > You wrote test-new-egg and a ton of other stuff. Thank you for all > your efforts for Scheme; Chicken's infrastructure works really well! That's very nice of you. Thanks for your kind words. Really appreciated. All the best.

Re: New egg: srfi-173

Hi Sergey, On Thu, 05 Nov 2020 13:03:10 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I have just created my second egg (the first in many years), and would > like to ask that it be published. > > It is a simple packaging up in Chicken egg format of the very small and > simple SRFI-173: Hooks[1]. > > I've p

Re: New egg: SRFI-35

On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 00:30:18 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I just created a new egg for SRFI-35, and would like to submit it for > publication. > > Its documentation is here: [1] > > Its release-info is here: [2] > > I've ran test-new-egg on it, and it reported that the "Egg looks ok" > >

Re: New egg: SRFI-152

On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 13:29:13 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I'd like to submit for publication a new egg: SRFI-152 > > Its documentation is here: [1] > > The release-info is here: [2] > > test-new-egg gives it a clean bill of health. > > Thanks to everyone on #chicken for helping me to solve

Re: New egg: SRFI-130: Cursor-based string library

On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 18:03:05 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit a new egg for publication: > > SRFI-130: Cursor-based string library > > The documentation is here: [1] > > The release-info is here: [2] > > and test-new-egg has given it a clean bill of health. > > --Serge

Re: SRFI-60 (Integers as Bits) ported from Chicken 4 to 5

On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 20:48:00 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I just ported SRFI-60 (Integers as Bits) from Chicken 4 to 5 and would > like to submit it for publication. > > Its documentation can be found here: [1] > > Its release-info is here: [2] > > and test-new-egg gives is a clean bill of h

Re: New egg: SRFI-171: Transducers

On Sat, 07 Nov 2020 08:48:38 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit a new egg, SRFI-171: Transducers, for > publication. > > Its documentation is here: [1] > > Its release-info is here: [2] > > and test-new-egg gives it a clean bill of health. > > --Sergey > > [1] - https://wiki

Re: New egg: SRFI-111: Boxes

On Sat, 07 Nov 2020 12:58:33 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I've just ported SRFI-111: Boxes, and would like so submit it for publication. > > Its documentation is here: [1] > > Its release-info is here: [2] > > test-new-egg has given it a clean bill of health. > > Although there was a "box" e

Re: SRFI-38 ported from Chicken 4 to 5

On Fri, 06 Nov 2020 01:37:04 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I just ported the SRFI-38 egg from Chicken 4 to 5, and would like to > submit it for publication. > > The Chicken 5 documentation (copied verbatim from the Chicken 4 egg) is here: > [1] > > The release-info file is here: [2] > > A ru

Re: New egg: SRFI-45: Primitives for Expressing Iterative Lazy Algorithms

On Sat, 07 Nov 2020 18:42:14 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > With Kon Lovett's permission, I just finished porting his SRFI-45 egg to > Chicken 5, and would like to submit it for publication. > > Its documentation is here: [1] > > Its release-info is here: [2] > > and test-new-egg gave it a cle

Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 12:58:37 +0100 Vasilij Schneidermann wrote: > I've implemented SRFI-145 in terms of the existing assert macro. > `salmonella` and `test-new-egg` run fine with > . A wiki page is > ready to be submitted after inclusion into

Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

On Mon, 9 Nov 2020 18:04:30 +0100 Vasilij Schneidermann wrote: > SRFI-158 (Generators) is ready as well: > https://depp.brause.cc/srfi-158/srfi-158.release-info Thanks again. It's been added as well. All the best. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario

Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

Hi Jeremy, On Mon, 09 Nov 2020 10:13:19 -0700 Jeremy Steward wrote: > Ooh boy, is SRFI 158 ready to go? > > If that's the case, should we deprecate / remove SRFI 121 from the coop? > > I am currently the maintainer, but am happy to focus efforts on 158 over 121. Thanks for following up on that

Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 01:26:33 +0100 Vasilij Schneidermann wrote: > SRFI-146 is ready for inclusion as well: > https://depp.brause.cc/srfi-146/srfi-146.release-info Thanks! Your egg has been added to the coop. All the best. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario

Re: New egg: SRFI-196: Range Objects

On Mon, 09 Nov 2020 17:38:42 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit for publication SRFI-196: Range Objects > > The documentation is here: [1] > > The release-info is here: [2] > > test-new-egg gives it a clean bill of health > > --Sergey > > [1] - https://wiki.call-cc.org/egg

Re: New egg: SRFI-197: Pipeline Operators

On Mon, 09 Nov 2020 19:44:48 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit a new egg for publication: > > SRFI-197: Pipeline Operators > > The documentation is here: [1] > > The release-info is here: [2] > > test-new-egg has given it a clean bill of health. > > --Sergey > > > [1] - h

Re: New egg: SRFI-160: Homogeneous numeric vector libraries

On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 09:44:47 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I'd like to submit a new egg for publication: > > SRFI-160: Homogeneous numeric vector libraries > > Its documentation is here: [1] > > Its release-info is here: [2] > > test-new-egg has given it a clean bill of health. > > --Ser

Re: New egg: SRFI-66: Octet Vectors

On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 11:50:17 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit a new egg for publication: > > SRFI-66: Octet Vectors > > The documentation is here: [1] > > The release-info is here: [2] > > I got permission from foof (who wrote the Chicken 3 version) to port this. > > tes

Re: New egg: SRFI-5: A compatible let form with signatures and rest arguments

On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:30:17 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit for publication a new egg: > > SRFI-5: A compatible let form with signatures and rest arguments > > Its documentation can be found here: [1] > > Its release-info is here: [2] > > test-new-egg gives it a clean

Re: Determining the correct, most up-to-date source/document for scraping CHICKEN SRFI metadata from

Hi, On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 05:07:58 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > Summary: > > The "SRFI Table" project, which scrapes information about Chicken SRFI > support, needs to find an authoritative and up-to-date source of this > information. > > Background: > > Many of you will be familiar with the

Re: Determining the correct, most up-to-date source/document for scraping CHICKEN SRFI metadata from

On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:38:39 -0800 wrote: > On Wed 11 Nov 2020 05:29:22 PM +01, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: >> >> If you assume that the SRFIs supported by the CHICKEN core are static >> and the only variable source of supported SRFIs is eggs, you can get a >> li

Re: New egg: srfi-135

On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 15:24:19 -0500 Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to submit a new egg, srfi-135, which provides SRFI 135 > immutable texts. I've run it past test-new-egg, which says > "Egg looks ok!". > > The egg source can be found at: > > https://github.com/Zipheir/srfi

Re: New egg: srfi-189

On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 02:48:06 -0500 Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe wrote: > I'd like to submit a new egg which provides SRFI 189: Maybe and Either > for CHICKEN. I've run it past test-new-egg, which found no issues. > > The egg source can be found at: > > https://github.com/Zipheir/srfi-189-chicken > >

Re: New egg: SRFI-48: Intermediate Format Strings

On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 10:14:48 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit for publication a new egg: > > SRFI-48: Intermediate Format Strings > > Its documentation can be found here: [1] > > Its release-info is here: [2] > > test-new-egg gives it a clean bill of health. > > --Sergey

Re: New egg: SRFI-207: String-notated bytevectors

On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 22:34:59 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit a new egg for publication: > > SRFI-207: String-notated bytevectors > > The documentation for this egg is here: [1] > > The release-info is here: [2] > > test-new-egg has given it a clean bill of health. > >

Re: scm2wiki egg release

Hi Utz, On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 13:04:32 +0100 ipc...@arcor.de wrote: > Think my little auto-documentation tool has matured enough for an > official egg release. Wrote it mainly to generate API documentation > for my Bintracker project > (https://bintracker.org/documentation/index.html), but maybe so

Re: scm2wiki egg release

On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 21:05:49 +0100 ipc...@arcor.de wrote: > Argh! Had only tested with salmonella, which, strangely enough, didn't > trigger the issue. Anyway, should be fixed now. Sorry for the > inconvenience. No problem at all! Thanks for addressing the issue so quickly. Salmonella is somewh

Re: SRFI-27 has been ported to Chicken 5

On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:12:54 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > SRFI-27 has been ported to Chicken 5, thanks to the enormous effort of > Kon Lovett, who solved all the most difficult problems encountered > during the port. > > The documentation for this egg can be found here: [1] > > The release-i

Re: SRFI-95: Sorting and Merging, ported to Chicken 5

On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 11:56:23 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > With Peter Danenberg's permission, I've ported his SRFI-95 egg to > Chicken 5. > > Its documentation is here: [1] > > The release-info is here: [2] > > test-new-egg gives it a clean bill of health. > > --Sergey > > [1] - https://wik

Re: New egg: SRFI-51: Handling rest list

On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 16:31:39 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I'd like to submit a new egg for publication: > > SRFI-51: Handling rest list > > Its documenation is here: [1] > > Its release-info is here: [2] > > test-new-egg gave it a clean bill of health. > > --Sergey > > [1] - https://wiki

Re: New egg: SRFI-74: Octet-Addressed Binary Blocks

On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 23:14:16 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit a new egg for publication: > > SRFI-74: Octet-Addressed Binary Blocks > > Its documentation is here: [1] > > Its release-info is here: [2] > > test-new-egg gives it a clean bill of health. > > --Sergey > > [

Re: New egg: SRFI-67: Compare Procedures

On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 21:42:00 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I'd like to submit a new egg for publication: > > SRFI-67: Compare Procedures > > This was packed from the reference implementation with permission from > Kon Lovett, the author of the Chicken 3 SRFI-67 egg. > > Unfortunately, that

Re: Establishing Git repos for miscellaneous Chicken tools

On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 23:14:03 +0200 Lassi Kortela wrote: > We spoke with Mario and Dan about gathering Git repos for all the > Chicken Emacs packages under one roof, and Dan suggested adding other > tools such as an LSP server into the mix. > > We thought it'd be convenient to start an organizatio

Re: Establishing Git repos for miscellaneous Chicken tools

On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 18:36:24 +0200 Lassi Kortela wrote: >> Switching git hosting solutions should be just a matter of changing the git >> URL. > > AFAICT this can be achieved by turning off the issue tracker and wiki > on GitHub repos. This would mean we use the mailing list, Chicken's > issue t

Re: New egg: SRFI-78: Lightweight testing

On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 10:04:36 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit a new egg for publication: > > SRFI-78: Lightweight testing > > The documentation is here: [1] > > The release-info is here: [2] > > test-new-egg gives the egg a clean bill of health. > > --Sergey > > [1] -

Re: Establishing Git repos for miscellaneous Chicken tools

On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 20:41:31 +0200 Lassi Kortela wrote: >> Please note that what I wrote was just a suggestion to prevent future >> problems. I don't mean to impose anything. If you think using GitHub, >> GitLab or whatever git host available would be a good solution, that's >> absolutely fine

Re: Establishing Git repos for miscellaneous Chicken tools

On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 20:59:01 +0200 Lassi Kortela wrote: >> Sounds good to me. Thanks for organizing this. > > Great. Mario, can you create the org since from our initial group of > contributors you are the one most closely associated with Chicken? Sure. What should it be called? All the best.

Re: New egg: SRFI-137: Minimal Unique Types

On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:15:32 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit a new egg for publication: > > SRFI-137: Minimal Unique Types > > The documentation for it is here: [1] > > Its release-info is here: [2] > > test-new-egg gives it a clean bill of health. > > --Sergey > > [1

Re: New egg: SRFI-47: Array

On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:52:31 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit a new egg for publication: > > SRFI-47: Array > > This is a Chicken 5 port, with permission, of Felix Winkelmann's Chicken > 3 egg[1]. > > The documentation for it can be found here: [2] > > The release-info i

Re: New egg: SRFI-143: Fixnums

On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 17:56:33 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit for publication: > > SRFI-143: Fixnums > > Its documentation is here: [1] > > Its release-info is here: [2] > > test-new-egg gives the egg a clean bill of health. > > --Sergey > > [1] - https://wiki.call-cc.

Re: New egg: SRFI-141: Integer division

On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 21:02:15 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit a new egg for publication, > > SRFI-141: Integer division > > Its documentation is here: [1] > > Its release-info is here: [2] > > test-new-egg gave it a clean bill of health. > > --Sergey > > [1] - https://w

Re: Establishing Git repos for miscellaneous Chicken tools

On Tue, 17 Nov 2020 21:11:10 +0200 Lassi Kortela wrote: >> Sure. What should it be called? > > Is "chicken-tools" ok? Or "chicken-integrations" or "chicken-contrib"? > Or even more generically, "chicken-scheme" which doesn't exist yet. > > It could be "chicken-emacs" but Dan suggested: > >> an o

Re: New egg: SRFI 178: Bitvector library

On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 11:56:05 -0500 Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to add the following new egg, which provides the SRFI 178 > (https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-178/srfi-178.html) bitvector library. > test-new-egg says "Egg looks good!". > > The repository is here: > > https:

Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses

On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:36:56 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit a new egg for publication: > > SRFI-87: => in case clauses > > Its documentation is here: [1] > > Its release-info is here: [2] > > test-new-egg gives it a clean bill of health. > > --Sergey > > [1] - https:

Re: New egg: unveil

On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 19:16:29 -0500 Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to add the following new egg, which provides unveil(2) > support for CHICKENs running under OpenBSD. test-new-egg says > "Egg looks good!". > > The repository is here: > > https://github.com/Zipheir/unveil-

Re: Issue installing some packages with nixpkgs

Hi Blake, On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 12:09:22 + Blake Sweeney wrote: > I'm trying to install some packages using nixpkgs on osx using egg2nix and ran > into a strange issue with llrb-tree. It cannot be installed because of failure > to create a strange path. Other packages like srfi-69, list-utils,

Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses

On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 08:18:54 -0800 wrote: > On Sat 21 Nov 2020 12:14:29 PM +01, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: >> >> >> Thanks. I'm afraid SRFI-87 is already supported by CHICKEN core, isn't >> it? Am I missing something? > > Hmm... it wasn't list

Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses

On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 16:40:21 -0800 wrote: > On Sat 21 Nov 2020 09:28:10 PM +01, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: >> >> The support for `=>' in cond clauses has been added [to CHICKEN 4.9.0] >> to conform to R7RS, not exactly to support SRFI-87, as far as I can >>

Re: New egg: SRFI-132: Sort Libraries

On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 16:13:57 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit a new egg for publication: > > SRFI-132: Sort Libraries > > Its documentation is here: > > https://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/srfi-132 > > Its release-info is here: > > https://github.com/diamond-lizard/srf

Re: New egg: SRFI-94: Type-Restricted Numerical Functions

On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 18:44:10 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit a new egg for publication: > > SRFI-94: Type-Restricted Numerical Functions > > Its documentation is here: > > https://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/srfi-94 > > Its release-info is here: > > https://github.com

Re: New egg: AMQP

On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 15:58:59 +0100 Fredrik Appelberg wrote: > I'd like to submit a new egg I've been working on for a while. It is a > low-level client for AMQP 0.9.1 which implements all commands found in > the specification, functions for sending and receiving messages, plus a > dispatch mecha

Re: New egg: SRFI 134: Immutable deques

On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 15:55:36 -0500 Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe wrote: > I'd like to submit a new CHICKEN 5 egg to the coop. It provides SRFI > 134 immutable deques (https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-134/). > > test-new-egg says "Egg looks good!". > > The repo is here: > > https://github.com/Zipheir/sr

Re: New egg: transmission

On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 13:07:42 + siiky wrote: > On 12/1/20 11:04 PM, siiky wrote: >> >> I'd like to share the `transmision` egg with everyone. It implements >> an API for the Transmission RPC. >> >> `test-new-egg` says "Egg looks ok!". >> >> You can find the code here: https://github.com/siiky/t

Re: New egg: srfi-209

On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 18:03:39 -0500 Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe wrote: > I'd like to add a new egg to the coop. It provides SRFI 209's enums > and enum types in CHICKEN 5. test-new-egg says "Egg looks ok!" > > The repository is here: > > https://github.com/Zipheir/srfi-209-chicken > > The wiki docu

Re: New egg: awful-sse: Server-sent events for Awful

On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 14:23:22 +0100 Daniel Ziltener wrote: > I ported the awful-sse egg to Chicken 5, it can be added to the egg > repository. > > The git repository can be found here: > https://gitea.lyrion.ch/zilti/awful-sse.git > The wiki page has already been created as well: http://wiki.ca

Re: New egg: edn: Reading and writing the EDN data format

On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 15:09:04 +0100 Daniel Ziltener wrote: > I ported the EDN egg I wrote for Chicken 4 to Chicken 5, it can be added to > the egg repository. > > The git repository can be found here: https://gitea.lyrion.ch/zilti/edn.git > And the wiki page at: http://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/e

Re: Updating yaml egg from Chicken 4 to Chicken 5?

Hi, On Wed, 30 Dec 2020 15:17:33 -0500 "T. Kurt Bond" wrote: > There is a Chicken 4 egg yaml that wraps libyaml. The source from its gihub > repo doesn't compile, because there is a missing in a > define-record-type form. I submitted a issue about this at the github repo > with a patch that

Re: Noob needs current tutorial please

On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 03:16:36 + André Sá wrote: > On 1/10/21 2:51 AM, Duke Normandin wrote: >> Hello & Happy New Year! >> >> I'm new to Chicken Scheme. I've got some exposure to newLISP and >> Gambit-C. I'm continueing my test-drive of Chicken because it >> produced the smallest executable for

Re: Chicken on Debian

Hi Duke, On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 13:09:37 -0700 Duke Normandin wrote: > Debian shows only: > > dnormandin@ASUSLAP:~$ apt search chicken > Sorting... Done > Full Text Search... Done > chicken-bin/oldstable 4.11.0-1 amd64 > Practical and portable Scheme system - compiler > > dnormandin@ASUSLAP:~$ sud

Re: Chicken on Debian

On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 14:15:14 -0700 Duke Normandin wrote: > On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 22:05:21 +0100 > Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: > > Hey Mario ... > > Thanks for all the help!! You're welcome! > [snip] > >> If you want to compile CHICKEN from sources, it's

Re: Web page with quick links to all C4 and C5 egg versions

Hi Lassi, On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:12:52 +0200 Lassi Kortela wrote: > Here's a listing of all eggs with > > - egg name > - description > - license > - latest egg version number for Chicken 5 > - latest egg version number for Chicken 4 > - link to egg documentation (wiki) and git repo for both vers

Re: Web page with quick links to all C4 and C5 egg versions

Hi Lassi, On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 15:55:04 +0200 Lassi Kortela wrote: >> Isn't that page similar to https://eggs.call-cc.org/4/ and >> https://eggs.call-cc.org/5/ in terms of content? > > It collects both Chicken 4 and Chicken 5 versions of the information > on the same page, which is its main point

Re: CHICKEN 5 port of bencode egg

Hi Caolan, On Sat, 23 Jan 2021 10:13:40 + "Caolan McMahon" wrote: > I recently merged a pull request from fancycade to port the bencode > egg from CHICKEN 4 to CHICKEN 5. I've updated the release-info file > and tagged a new release. > > https://github.com/caolan/chicken-bencode/ > > It's al

Re: Adding deprecation notices to CHICKEN 4 egg docs?

Hi, On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 14:24:29 +0100 Peter Bex wrote: > I've noticed that the documentation for CHICKEN 3 eggs (and also for > CHICKEN 2 eggs, where we have them) contain a "OUTDATED EGG" warning > at the top, to warn people away from them. > > I'm thinking, maybe we should do something simila

Most call-cc.org services are currently down

Hi, Unfortunately we are currently experiencing issues with most of the call-cc.org services. The following services are not available: * www.call-cc.org * bugs.call-cc.org * code.call-cc.org * paste.call-cc.org * tests.call-cc.org * wiki.call-cc.org api.call-cc.org and the main egg server are

Re: Most call-cc.org services are currently down

Hi again, All services are back to normal operation. If you observe any problem, please contact us. All the best. Mario On Sat, 30 Jan 2021 10:00:09 +0100 Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: > Hi, > > Unfortunately we are currently experiencing issues with most of the > call-cc.org se

Re: Orphan SRFI eggs and maintainership changes

On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:06:17 -0500 Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe wrote: > I've been in touch with Sergey Goldgaber, who created a number of > eggs for various SRFIs late last year. He's no longer maintaining > these eggs: > >> Sorry, I have been pulled away from the chicken world for the foreseeable

Re: Orphan SRFI eggs and maintainership changes

On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 01:36:12 + Diego wrote: >> I'm appealing to anyone who has the inclination and time to take over some >> of these. > > I'd like to maintain the following (with new urls following egg names, passed > test-new-egg): > > * srfi-143: https://code.dieggsy.com/srfi-143/plain/s

Re: Orphan SRFI eggs and maintainership changes

On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 18:23:59 -0500 Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe wrote: > I'd also like to pick up maintenance of srfi-132, which is another > orphan. > > The new release-info is at > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Zipheir/srfi-132/main/release-info Thanks, Wofgang. The location of srfi-132 has

Re: New egg: integer-map

On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 21:33:59 -0500 Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe wrote: > I'd like to announce (and add to the coop) a new egg, integer-map, > which provides immutable mapping structures optimized for fixnum keys. > > The documentation is at https://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/integer-map > The interface

State of CHICKEN 2021

Dear CHICKENeers, We've set up a "State of CHICKEN 2021" survey at http://surveys.call-cc.org/state-of-chicken/2021/ It would be great to have your inputs and feedback. Your opinion is important to help us improve CHICKEN. Hopefully the survey is not too boring and/or buggy. If you encounter a

Re: State of CHICKEN 2021

Hi, On Tue, 09 Mar 2021 19:46:06 +0100 Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: > We've set up a "State of CHICKEN 2021" survey at > http://surveys.call-cc.org/state-of-chicken/2021/ > > It would be great to have your inputs and feedback. Your opinion is > import

Re: New egg: r7rs-tools

On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 18:51:44 + Diego wrote: > I've made a new egg r7rs-tools that provides r7csc and r7csi, which > are roughly r7rs-only-by-default versions of csc and csi (essentially, > the initial environment is only (scheme base) by default, no scheme, > (chicken base) or (chicken syntax

Re: port of xml-rpc to Chicken 5

Hi Chris, On Tue, 06 Apr 2021 19:53:32 -0700 Chris Brannon wrote: > I'm taking over maintenance of the xml-rpc egg. > I've ported it to Chicken 5. > The .release-info file is here: > https://the-brannons.com/cgit/cgit.cgi/chicken-xml-rpc/plain/xml-rpc.release-info Just double-checking to avoid

Re: port of xml-rpc to Chicken 5

Hi, On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 07:36:21 +0200 Peter Bex wrote: > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 06:41:30PM -0700, Chris Brannon wrote: >> Mario Domenech Goulart writes: >> >> > Just double-checking to avoid misunderstandings: have you contacted >> > Peter Bex (maintaine

Re: State of CHICKEN 2021

Hi, On Sun, 21 Mar 2021 09:44:51 +0100 Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: > On Tue, 09 Mar 2021 19:46:06 +0100 Mario Domenech Goulart > wrote: > >> We've set up a "State of CHICKEN 2021" survey at >> http://surveys.call-cc.org/state-of-chicken/2021/ >> &g

Re: Nightly Chicken packages, and Chicken packaging

Hi Daniel, On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 18:45:24 +0200 Daniel Ziltener wrote: > I started building Chicken from the git repository as a "Nightly Build". > Currently, there are only RPM packages, DEB might follow later. The packages > are in my personal Chicken repository on openSUSE's OBS service and a

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >