Re: [Chicken-users] srfi-128 - almost

Hi Jörg, On 20 Aug 2018 19:24:28 +0200 Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote: > The release-info worried me too - TLD; super simple: if nothing else > changes, it should work as before. > > To add it to the C5 coop send a note to the list that >

Re: [Chicken-users] srfi-128 - almost

Hi Jörg, On 20 Aug 2018 19:33:24 +0200 Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote: > Thanks Mario, > > at the end of the day your suggestion will solve the development time > considerations I have. Except for the "check the download process" > part. > > Though actually rolling those out over a test network

Re: [Chicken-users] porting eggs experiences and questions

Hi Jörg, On 17 Aug 2018 12:33:28 +0200 Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote: > I just ported a first egg. (Pigeon-hole, "simple" mailbox with > capacity constraint flow control and no timeouts.) > > * Question: what's about the .release-info > > This https://wiki.call-cc.org/porting-c4-to-c5 was

Re: [Chicken-users] New egg: gumbo

Hi Caolan, On Tue, 6 Mar 2018 10:21:03 + Caolan McMahon wrote: > Please can someone add this to the egg index? > > https://github.com/caolan/chicken-gumbo > > It provides bindings to the Gumbo HTML parser from Google > (https://github.com/google/gumbo-parser). > >

Re: [Chicken-users] Awful ($db ...)

Hi, On Sun, 7 Oct 2018 13:20:29 +0200 Peter Bex wrote: > On Sun, Oct 07, 2018 at 09:08:48PM +1000, David Ireland wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm using the database access in Awful and I'm having the troubles >> recreating an example in the docs. After setting up a dummy postgres >> database I tried

Re: [Chicken-users] [NEW EGG] pbkdf2

Hi, On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 00:19:59 +0200 "alfred j. quack" wrote: > Hello Chicken-users, > > i'm so excited to announce my first egg today! > > It's my first contribution to open source software in general and I'm > proud to give something back to the very welcoming chicken > community. Thank you

Re: [Chicken-users] Returning JSON in Awful

Hi David, On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 15:13:14 +1000 David Ireland wrote: > I've started using Awful 1.0 and having trouble returning a JSON string. The > inverted commas are being replaced by For example, using > the code below returns {a : 1 } > > Should this be normal behavior when returning JSON

Re: [Chicken-users] new egg: envsubst

Hi Robert, On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:51:27 -0500 Robert Jensen wrote: > I cloned envsubst [1] in Chicken 5. You can check it out here [2]. > > All the best, > Rob > > [1] > https://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/html_node/envsubst-Invocation.html > [2] https://github.com/r1b/envsubst

Re: [Chicken-users] Gnuplot pipe

Hi Francesco, On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 16:17:08 +0100 Francesco Montanari wrote: > I put together a simple interface to Gnuplot, basically popen() with a > couple of procedures to plot lists. The motivation is mainly to draw > exploratory plots from the interpreter. If you think this may be > useful

Re: [Chicken-users] chicken-install package integrity/signing

Hi Jason, On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 23:55:56 + Jason Valencia wrote: > Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: >> On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 00:11:51 + Jason Valencia wrote: >> > Until this is resolved, is anyone aware of good ways to install eggs >> > more securely? A

Re: [Chicken-users] chicken-install package integrity/signing

Hi Jason, On Sun, 23 Dec 2018 00:11:51 + Jason Valencia wrote: > Thomas Chust wrote: >> Hello, >> >> implementing package signatures is technically not such a big deal >> (see the experimental example script here: >>

Re: [Chicken-users] new egg: simple-timer

Hi Jörg, On 24 Nov 2018 21:59:08 +0100 Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote: > I packages a new new: simple-timer > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/0-8-15/simple-timer/master/simple-timer.release-info > > This is intended as the one-stop shopping for low level plumping of > the background threads

Re: [Chicken-users] new egg: simple-timer

Hi Jörg, On 25 Nov 2018 18:21:29 +0100 Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote: > Thanks Mario, > > I tagged a better version. Thanks. I've added your egg to the coop. All the best. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario ___ Chicken-users mailing list

Re: [Chicken-users] Error installing egg, but only on Raspbian

Hi Christoph, On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 09:20:59 +0100 Christoph Lange wrote: > I adapted the Telebot (Telegram client) egg to be installable as Chicken 5 > egg: > > https://github.com/recumbentbirder/Telebot/tree/make-chicken-5-egg > > This works fine to install on my Arch Linux (Chicken installed

Re: [Chicken-users] Error installing egg, but only on Raspbian

Hi Vasilij, On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 10:10:42 +0100 Vasilij Schneidermann wrote: >> I'm a bit lost here as to *where to start* looking to solve this. Any >> suggestions / comments? > > There's a few things you can try: > > - C5 creates many files during the installation process, perhaps you can >

Re: [Chicken-users] New C5 egg: color

On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 23:37:43 -0600 Erik Falor wrote: > I've ported the color egg to Chicken 5. I've followed Kristian's lead > and used cond-expand to keep backwards-compatibility with Chicken 4. > > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/fadein/chicken-color/master/color.release-info Thanks, Erik.

Re: [Chicken-users] Chicken 5 support for generalized-arrays egg

Hi Jeremy, On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 22:45:03 -0700 Jeremy Steward wrote: > Spent some time to update and add support for my generalized-arrays egg > today. Find the release info file at: > > https://bitbucket.org/ThatGeoGuy/chicken-generalized-arrays/raw/master/generalized-arrays.release-info

Re: [Chicken-users] SRFI-123 ported to Chicken 5

Hi Diego, On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 19:46:11 + Diego wrote: > I've ported SRFI-123 to C5: https://github.com/dieggsy/srfi-123 > > I also made some minor fixes to lingering issues I hadn't yet cleaned up. Thanks. I've added it to the coop. A minor issue: srfi-4 is part of the CHICKEN core, not

Re: [Chicken-users] Back from the dead: pstk

Hi Heinz, On Tue, 26 Feb 2019 14:53:45 +0100 ipc...@arcor.de wrote: > As promised, I've ported the pstk egg to Chicken 5, and would like to > take over as maintainer. > > https://github.com/utz82/pstk > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/utz82/pstk/master/pstk.release-info > > License has been

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] ck-macros 0.2.0

On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 22:45:42 -0600 John Croisant wrote: > The ck-macros egg version 0.2.0 has been released. This version adds > CHICKEN 5 support, many new features, some R5RS compatibility fixes, and > a few breaking changes to the API. > >     https://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/ck-macros > >

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] stty egg ported to CHICKEN 5

Hi, On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 01:39:03 -0700 Erik Falor wrote: > I've ported the stty egg to C5: > > https://github.com/fadein/chicken-stty > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/fadein/chicken-stty/master/stty.release-info > > I've also copied and updated the eggref document from C4 over to C5: >

Re: [Chicken-users] trouble installing utf8 egg

Hi Paul, On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 10:16:56 -0500 paul wisehart wrote: > On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 11:24:13AM +0100, ko...@upyum.com wrote: >> BUT, yesterday evening I updated the utf8 egg so that it doesn’t install >> extra files, so if you retry now, it should work. > > Thanks! That worked. > Is

Re: [Chicken-users] trouble installing utf8 egg

Hi Paul, On Mon, 4 Mar 2019 10:54:36 -0500 paul wisehart wrote: > On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 07:00:22PM +0100, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: >> >> You can check out a copy of the svn repo: >> >> $ svn co https://code.call-cc.org/svn/chicken-eggs/release/5/ut

Re: [Chicken-users] new egg: xmkit

Hi, On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 13:28:30 +0100 lundi wrote: > I have completed a new egg: > https://github.com/utz82/xmkit-scm > > It's for parsing XM (Fasttracker 2 music module) files. Probably not > too useful for the majority of Chicken users, but hey, more is always > good, right? > > Since it's

Re: [Chicken-users] chibi-generic egg

Hi Diego, On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 17:20:48 + Diego wrote: > I've wrapped chibi's generic function interface: > > http://synthcode.com/scheme/chibi/lib/chibi/generic.html > > in a Chicken 5 egg here: > > https://github.com/dieggsy/chibi-generic > > I like that it's quite simple and intuitive to

Re: [Chicken-users] Gnuplot pipe

Hi Francesco, On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 22:59:49 +0100 Francesco Montanari wrote: > On 1/21/19 7:08 AM, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: >> If you have a chance, please consider porting it to CHICKEN 5 too. > > I ported the egg to CHICKEN 5 and added a new release file: > > https:/

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] sdl2, sdl2-image, sdl2-ttf eggs ported to CHICKEN 5

Hi John, On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 19:46:34 -0600 John Croisant wrote: > sdl2 v0.3.0, sdl2-image v0.2.0, and sdl2-ttf v0.2.0 have been released. > > The main changes are compatibility with CHICKEN 5 (as well as CHICKEN > 4), a more user-friendly installation process, and support for linking > to

Re: [Chicken-users] Allegro ported to Chicken 5 (Coop update?)

Hi Dan, On Tue, 12 Feb 2019 06:00:39 + Dan Leslie wrote: > Thanks in large part to a Pull Request from Olivier Matz the Allegro Egg has > been ported to Chicken 5. > > I've attempted to follow the information in the wiki[0] with regards to how > to port an egg from C4 to C5 in the simple

Re: [Chicken-users] salmonella + test egg failure

Hi, On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 23:02:23 +0100 lundi wrote: > Trying to lint my work-in-progress egg with salmonella. Got a > tests/run.scm set up with some tests, using Alex Shinn's test egg. I > can run my test code in csi, but not with salmonella. From > salmonella.log: > > Error: (import) during

Re: [Chicken-users] salmonella + test egg failure

Hi, On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 23:46:26 +0100 lundi wrote: > Thanks Mario, that does indeed fix the issue. Great! > Now I see that it's even mentioned in > https://wiki.call-cc.org/eggs%20tutorial. > My apologies for failing to rtfm. No worries. All the best. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario

Re: [Chicken-users] hahn/salmonella issues

Hi, On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 14:57:17 +0100 lundi wrote: > A new day, some new questions. First up, Chicken version is 4.13.0. > > For my wip egg, I'm trying to auto-generate docs with hahn. > This works fine as far as running hahn from command line is > concerned. However, things fail when trying

Re: [Chicken-users] New Egg: Shen

Hi David, On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 13:52:43 +1000 David Ireland wrote: > I've put together an Egg for the Shen programming language. It may interest > some people working on logic programming and natural language > processing. > > Shen is a hosted language with an inbuilt prolog and YACC. At the

Re: [Chicken-users] zlib for chicken 5

Hi Robert, On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 22:08:44 -0400 Robert Jensen wrote: > I ported [1] to Chicken 5. You can find the source at [2]. > > [1] http://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/4/zlib > [2] https://github.com/r1b/zlib/releases/tag/0.6 Have you tried to contact the author to check whether he is ok at

Re: [Chicken-users] hahn: chicken 5 port

Hello Robert, On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 23:19:10 -0400 Robert Jensen wrote: > I ported hahn to chicken 5. You can find the release here: > > https://github.com/klutometis/hahn/releases/tag/0.10 Thanks! It has been added to the coop. Please consider providing documentation for it to the wiki. All

Re: [Chicken-users] hahn: chicken 5 port

(import chicken) which works on both C4 and C5, like this: > https://github.com/Adellica/chicken-nanomsg/blob/master/nanomsg-module.scm > > Hope that comes in handy, > K. > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 11:35 PM Mario Domenech Goulart > wrote: > > Hi Robert, > >

Re: [Chicken-users] hahn: chicken 5 port

Hi, On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 23:19:10 -0400 Robert Jensen wrote: > I ported hahn to chicken 5. You can find the release here: > > https://github.com/klutometis/hahn/releases/tag/0.10 Apparently support for CHICKEN 4 has been removed, causing a significant breakage in the CHICKEN 4 coop:

Re: [Chicken-users] hahn: chicken 5 port

g must be installable by both CHICKEN 4 and 5 (you probably need cond-expand to achieve that). All the best. Mario > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 4:20 PM Mario Domenech Goulart > wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 23:19:10 -0400 Robert Jensen > wrote: > > > I ported hahn to chick

Re: [Chicken-users] call-cc.org outage

Hi, On Wed, 05 Jun 2019 15:47:10 +0200 Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: > The call-cc.org server is down at the moment. Because of the outage, > most services are unavailable. > > Egg installation should work normally, as the primary egg server is a > separate machine. > >

[Chicken-users] call-cc.org outage

Hi, The call-cc.org server is down at the moment. Because of the outage, most services are unavailable. Egg installation should work normally, as the primary egg server is a separate machine. Wiki, svn, git, paste etc. are unfortunately unavailable. At the moment we don't know exactly when

Re: [Chicken-users] Looking for instructions to register an egg for 5.x

Hi Kay, On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 19:20:42 -0400 masukomi wrote: > I've come across a couple eggs that no longer exist in 5.x. When > speaking with one of the authors neither of us were sure what needed > too be done (beyond the 4->5 code and metadata port) to make the egg > show when you run

Re: [Chicken-users] .release-info for chicken-yaml

Hi Kay, On Thu, 20 Jun 2019 09:09:09 -0400 Kay Rhodes wrote: > Tenderlove has updated chicken-yaml for chicken 5 > > The .release-info file can be found here > https://raw.githubusercontent.com/tenderlove/chicken-yaml/master/yaml.release-info > > The full repo is here: > >

Re: [Chicken-users] SRFIs in Chicken 5

Hi Sven, On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 19:50:51 +0200 (CEST) Sven Hartrumpf wrote: > Hi. > > Is there a Chicken 5 version of the following > document, which seems to belong to Chicken 4 (?): > > http://wiki.call-cc.org/SRFI-conformance /SRFI-conformance is probably outdated (maybe it should be

Re: [Chicken-users] Is it possible to change the list of included modules when compiling Chicken?

Hi Jeronimo, On Sun, 12 May 2019 08:37:50 -0300 Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote: > On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 08:52:13AM +0200, Peter Bex wrote: >> On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 08:28:23PM -0300, Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > I am compiling it for wireless routers, and so far I could not

Re: [Chicken-users] The (chicken time) time macro gets in my way

Hi Mathieu, On Sun, 12 May 2019 20:52:47 + Mathieu wrote: > Hello Schemers, > > When I compile the following code : > > (define-record time hour minute) > > And compile in version 5 like so : > > csc5 source.scm > > I get the following warning : > > assigment to syntax `time' > > A clean

Re: [Chicken-users] is there a place where I can do a proper fork of the coops egg?

On Sat, 04 May 2019 16:00:56 +0200 Marco Maggi wrote: > Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: >> To check out the repo, use: > >> $ svn co https://code.call-cc.org/svn/chicken-eggs/release/5/coops coops > > I cloned the thing with "git svn": there is not much

Re: [Chicken-users] is there a place where I can do a proper fork of the coops egg?

Hi Marco, On Fri, 03 May 2019 15:09:57 +0200 Marco Maggi wrote: > I see nothing in the egg's home page. Usually, when you cannot find a link to the source repository in the egg documentation (wiki), it is in CHICKEN's svn repository. That's the case of coops. To check out the repo, use:

Re: [Chicken-users] is there a place where I can do a proper fork of the coops egg?

On Fri, 03 May 2019 15:39:14 +0200 Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: > On Fri, 03 May 2019 15:09:57 +0200 Marco Maggi > wrote: > >> I see nothing in the egg's home page. > > Usually, when you cannot find a link to the source repository in the egg > documentation (wiki)

Re: [Chicken-users] genann egg

Hi Diego, On Fri, 05 Jul 2019 02:57:47 + Diego wrote: > I was exploring this ANSI C neural network library > https://github.com/codeplea/genann and liked the relative simplicity > of it so I thought, why not make a chicken egg? Here it is: > > https://github.com/dieggsy/genann > > I've

Re: [Chicken-users] Monad ported to Chicken 5

Hi, On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 19:07:20 + Dan Leslie wrote: > Alice Maz has kindly ported the Monad egg from Chicken 4 to 5. > > As per what I've previously done with the Allegro port[0], I'd like to have > Henrietta track the new monad.chicken-5.release-info file[1]. > > 0:

Re: [Chicken-users] Debian 9 amd64 chicken-bin 4.11.0-1 cannot import from undefined module process-context

Hi David, On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 22:22:26 -0700 David Christensen wrote: > chicken-users: > > I am Chicken noob with (e-mail addresses redacted): Welcome! > 2019-09-17 22:06:21 root@tinkywinky ~ > # cat /etc/debian_version > 9.11 > > 2019-09-17 22:10:03 root@tinkywinky ~ > # uname -a > Linux

Re: [Chicken-users] Debian 9 amd64 chicken-bin 4.11.0-1 cannot import from undefined module process-context

On Wed, 18 Sep 2019 07:46:01 +0200 Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: >> 2019-09-17 22:06:21 root@tinkywinky ~ >> # cat /etc/debian_version >> 9.11 >> >> 2019-09-17 22:10:03 root@tinkywinky ~ >> # uname -a >> Linux tinkywinky 4.9.0-11-amd64 #1 SMP Debian

[Chicken-users] [ANN] salmonella 3.0.0 released

Hi, Salmonella is a tool to test CHICKEN eggs. See [1] for more information. A new version, 3.0.0, has [finally] been released. The new version supports CHICKEN 5. The release notes for the new version are here: [2]. Note that the same changes apply to salmonella for CHICKEN 4 too (see [3]).

Re: [Chicken-users] [ANN] test-new-egg 1.0.0 released

Hi Andy, On Mon, 29 Jul 2019 15:13:54 +0100 Andy Bennett wrote: >> test-new-egg is a simple commmand line tool to test new CHICKEN eggs >> before they are added to the official repository of eggs. For more >> information, see [1]. >> >> The new release adds support for CHICKEN 5. See [2] for

[Chicken-users] Scheduled maintenance of the call-cc.org server

Hi, This week the call-cc.org server will go through some maintenance, starting today at 11:00AM UTC. Expect some periods of unavailability of services behind the following domains: * call-cc.org * www.call-cc.org * gazette.call-cc.org * paste.call-cc.org * code.call-cc.org * bugs.call-cc.org *

Re: [Chicken-users] pdf: chicken 5 port

Hi Robert, On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 11:59:52 -0400 Robert Jensen wrote: > Following up - can this be added to the coop? Sure. Thanks for your egg. There's a small issue though: it tries to import srfi-69, but srfi-69 (an egg in C5) is not specified as a dependency in pdf.egg's `dependencies'

Re: [Chicken-users] ported Ephem egg to Chicken 5

Hi Rob, On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 20:39:59 -0400 Rob Altenburg wrote: > This egg contains bindings to the libnova library which is "a general > purpose, double precision, Celestial Mechanics, Astrometry and > Astrodynamics library" available under the GNU LPGL. > > See:

Re: [Chicken-users] pdf: chicken 5 port

Hi Rob, On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 19:20:00 -0400 Robert Jensen wrote: > I ported pdf [1] to chicken 5 [2]. I set up a release-info pointing at > the 1.1.0 tag. I have contacted the original author to inquire about > future maintenance. > > [1] http://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/4/pdf > [2]

Re: [Chicken-users] Status of srfi-64 egg

Hi Lassi, On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 22:46:54 +0300 Lassi Kortela wrote: > Seems there used to be a srfi-64 egg ("A Scheme API for test > suites"). But there's currently no page for it in the Chicken wiki - > neither for Chicken 4 or Chicken 5. Does anybody know about its > status, and whether it's

[Chicken-users] [ANN] test-new-egg 1.0.0 released

Hi, test-new-egg is a simple commmand line tool to test new CHICKEN eggs before they are added to the official repository of eggs. For more information, see [1]. The new release adds support for CHICKEN 5. See [2] for the release notes of this version. Note that the same changes apply to

Re: [Chicken-users] Egg: chicken-update (program)

Hi Diego, On Tue, 01 Oct 2019 04:59:10 + Diego via Chicken-users wrote: > I've created a simple program to update outdated eggs. At the moment, > it only works with the default servers, as it looks through the egg > RSS sxml file to determine new versions. By default, it ignores eggs >

Re: [ANN] Source code of all eggs as git repositories

Hi Tim, On Fri, 01 Nov 2019 13:43:09 +0100 plugd via wrote: > Mario Domenech Goulart writes: >> To fill this gap, we are making available git repositories that contain >> the source code of the whole set of eggs. See [2] for more information >> on how to clone them. >

[ANN] Source code of all eggs as git repositories

Hi, In the past we used to have the source code of all eggs under our central subversion repository, from which users could conveniently check out the source code of the whole set of eggs. Nowadays we have the egg repositories distributed [1], which is absolutely great for egg developers, as

Re: New SRFI-105 egg

Hi Diego, On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 06:36:48 + diego wrote: > Hi all - I've created a Chicken 5 egg for SRFI-105: curly infix > expressions. It implements both the base srfi and an (srfi-105 extra) > module that provides mixed operator and operator precedence > functionality. I've tested it with

Re: CHICKEN 5.2.0 has been released

Hi Daniel, On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 13:47:27 -0600 Daniel Ortmann wrote: > Ideas? > > $ chicken-install -version > 5.2.0 > $ which chicken-install > /usr/local/chicken-5.2.0/bin/chicken-install > $ rm -rf ~/.cache/* > $ ll ~/.cache/ > total 0 > $ chicken-install utf8 > building utf8 >

Re: New egg for 5

Hi Andrew, On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 19:34:12 -0500 Andrew Mack wrote: > I have a new egg to be added to the repo for 5. The name of the egg is > "vectr" (misspelling intentional). > > Release-info is here: > https://gitlab.com/v7x/vectr/-/raw/master/vectr.release-info I get the following error when

Re: New Egg: Termbox

Hi Justin, On Tue, 24 Dec 2019 12:36:14 -0700 Justin Meiners wrote: > I just created a new egg which is bindings for the termbox library. > I have done my best to follow documentation, but this is my first egg, so I > could use you're feedback and corrections. > > Github page: >

Re: New egg: web-colors

Hi John, On Tue, 31 Dec 2019 18:10:32 -0600 John Croisant wrote: > I have published a new egg, web-colors. It provides procedures to parse > and write colors in a variety of formats used in HTML/CSS: > > - Hex colors in #RGB, #RGBA, #RRGGBB, and #RRGGBBAA formats > - rgb() and rgba() colors > -

Re: New egg for C5: tokyocabinet

Hi Sven, On Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:47:30 +0100 (CET) Sven Hartrumpf wrote: > I published my first C5 egg: (a minimal set of) bindings to the tokyocabinet > library. > Currenty, this covers only reading from tch files; I will extend the egg > when I need more functions. > > I tested it with

Re: New egg: macaw

Hi John, On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 21:33:21 -0500 John Croisant wrote: > I have published a new egg, macaw. It provides efficient color types, > math operations, and color space conversion. It is primarily meant for > computer graphics, data visualization, image processing, games, etc. The > examples

Re: Clucker: A Twitter API egg (Chicken 5 support added)

Hi Nick, On Tue, 5 May 2020 16:03:40 -0400 nemo1...@gmail.com wrote: > I have finally updated the clucker egg to support Chicken 5. It also > finally has proper documentation complete with a simple working > example. The egg provides access to most of Twitter's RESTful and > streaming API

Bitbucket has decommissioned mercurial repositories

Hi, This message is targeted at egg authors who have eggs hosted in mercurial repositories in Bitbucket. Bitbucket has decommissioned mercurial repositories [1]. It seems that starting today those repositories are no longer available. We have many mercurial repositories hosted in Bitbucket

Re: New egg for SRFI 193: Command line

Hi Lassi, On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 13:08:51 +0300 Lassi Kortela wrote: >> Everything seems to be in order, I’ve added the egg to the repository! :) > > Thank you very much. > > Unfortunately it has a bug (my fault): chicken-install pre-compiles it > into a .so and (import (srfi 193)) in csi loads

Re: New egg for SRFI 193: Command line

Hi Lassi, On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 19:35:54 +0300 Lassi Kortela wrote: > You wrote test-new-egg and a ton of other stuff. Thank you for all > your efforts for Scheme; Chicken's infrastructure works really well! That's very nice of you. Thanks for your kind words. Really appreciated. All the best.

Re: How to select a c compiler for chicken-install

Hi Andrew, On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 10:34:10 -0500 Andrew Eggenberger wrote: > I used a gcc from macports to build and install chicken 5.2 from > source on macosx. I'd like chicken-install to use the same c compiler > for egg installation but it defaults to the xcode c compiler. I've > tried

Re: New Egg: SRFI-151

Hi Sören, On Sat, 08 Aug 2020 11:43:59 +0200 Sören Tempel wrote: > I created an egg for SRFI-151. This is my first egg, I tried to > carefully follow the instruction on the wiki regarding the creation and > publishing process. According to the wiki page on publishing eggs [1], > the egg has to

Re: New Egg: SRFI-151

Hi Sören, On Sat, 08 Aug 2020 18:58:35 +0200 Sören Tempel wrote: > Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: > >> My only remark would be regarding the license, which AFAIK should be >> MIT. John Cowan would be able to clarify that. > > I went through the license comments in th

Re: Web page with quick links to all C4 and C5 egg versions

Hi Lassi, On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:12:52 +0200 Lassi Kortela wrote: > Here's a listing of all eggs with > > - egg name > - description > - license > - latest egg version number for Chicken 5 > - latest egg version number for Chicken 4 > - link to egg documentation (wiki) and git repo for both

Re: New egg: awful-sse: Server-sent events for Awful

On Tue, 29 Dec 2020 14:23:22 +0100 Daniel Ziltener wrote: > I ported the awful-sse egg to Chicken 5, it can be added to the egg > repository. > > The git repository can be found here: > https://gitea.lyrion.ch/zilti/awful-sse.git > The wiki page has already been created as well:

Re: New egg: AMQP

On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 15:58:59 +0100 Fredrik Appelberg wrote: > I'd like to submit a new egg I've been working on for a while. It is a > low-level client for AMQP 0.9.1 which implements all commands found in > the specification, functions for sending and receiving messages, plus a > dispatch

Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses

On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 18:36:56 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit a new egg for publication: > > SRFI-87: => in case clauses > > Its documentation is here: [1] > > Its release-info is here: [2] > > test-new-egg gives it a clean bill of health. > > --Sergey > > [1] -

Re: New egg: unveil

On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 19:16:29 -0500 Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to add the following new egg, which provides unveil(2) > support for CHICKENs running under OpenBSD. test-new-egg says > "Egg looks good!". > > The repository is here: > >

Re: Issue installing some packages with nixpkgs

Hi Blake, On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 12:09:22 + Blake Sweeney wrote: > I'm trying to install some packages using nixpkgs on osx using egg2nix and ran > into a strange issue with llrb-tree. It cannot be installed because of failure > to create a strange path. Other packages like srfi-69,

Re: New egg: SRFI-87: => in case clauses

On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 16:40:21 -0800 wrote: > On Sat 21 Nov 2020 09:28:10 PM +01, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: >> >> The support for `=>' in cond clauses has been added [to CHICKEN 4.9.0] >> to conform to R7RS, not exactly to support SRFI-87, as far as I can >> tell

Re: New egg: SRFI-132: Sort Libraries

On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 16:13:57 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit a new egg for publication: > > SRFI-132: Sort Libraries > > Its documentation is here: > > https://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/srfi-132 > > Its release-info is here: > >

Re: New egg: SRFI-94: Type-Restricted Numerical Functions

On Sat, 21 Nov 2020 18:44:10 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit a new egg for publication: > > SRFI-94: Type-Restricted Numerical Functions > > Its documentation is here: > > https://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/srfi-94 > > Its release-info is here: > >

Re: New egg: SRFI 134: Immutable deques

On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 15:55:36 -0500 Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe wrote: > I'd like to submit a new CHICKEN 5 egg to the coop. It provides SRFI > 134 immutable deques (https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-134/). > > test-new-egg says "Egg looks good!". > > The repo is here: > >

Re: New egg: transmission

On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 13:07:42 + siiky wrote: > On 12/1/20 11:04 PM, siiky wrote: >> >> I'd like to share the `transmision` egg with everyone. It implements >> an API for the Transmission RPC. >> >> `test-new-egg` says "Egg looks ok!". >> >> You can find the code here:

Re: New egg: srfi-209

On Sat, 19 Dec 2020 18:03:39 -0500 Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe wrote: > I'd like to add a new egg to the coop. It provides SRFI 209's enums > and enum types in CHICKEN 5. test-new-egg says "Egg looks ok!" > > The repository is here: > > https://github.com/Zipheir/srfi-209-chicken > > The wiki

Re: New egg: SRFI-197: Pipeline Operators

On Mon, 09 Nov 2020 19:44:48 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit a new egg for publication: > > SRFI-197: Pipeline Operators > > The documentation is here: [1] > > The release-info is here: [2] > > test-new-egg has given it a clean bill of health. > > --Sergey > > > [1] -

Re: New C5 egg: SRFI-145: Assumptions

On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 01:26:33 +0100 Vasilij Schneidermann wrote: > SRFI-146 is ready for inclusion as well: > https://depp.brause.cc/srfi-146/srfi-146.release-info Thanks! Your egg has been added to the coop. All the best. Mario -- http://parenteses.org/mario

Re: New egg: SRFI-196: Range Objects

On Mon, 09 Nov 2020 17:38:42 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit for publication SRFI-196: Range Objects > > The documentation is here: [1] > > The release-info is here: [2] > > test-new-egg gives it a clean bill of health > > --Sergey > > [1] -

Re: New egg: SRFI-66: Octet Vectors

On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 11:50:17 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit a new egg for publication: > > SRFI-66: Octet Vectors > > The documentation is here: [1] > > The release-info is here: [2] > > I got permission from foof (who wrote the Chicken 3 version) to port this. > >

Re: New egg: SRFI-160: Homogeneous numeric vector libraries

On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 09:44:47 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I'd like to submit a new egg for publication: > > SRFI-160: Homogeneous numeric vector libraries > > Its documentation is here: [1] > > Its release-info is here: [2] > > test-new-egg has given it a clean bill of health. > >

Re: Determining the correct, most up-to-date source/document for scraping CHICKEN SRFI metadata from

Hi, On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 05:07:58 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > Summary: > > The "SRFI Table" project, which scrapes information about Chicken SRFI > support, needs to find an authoritative and up-to-date source of this > information. > > Background: > > Many of you will be familiar with the

Re: Determining the correct, most up-to-date source/document for scraping CHICKEN SRFI metadata from

On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 10:38:39 -0800 wrote: > On Wed 11 Nov 2020 05:29:22 PM +01, Mario Domenech Goulart wrote: >> >> If you assume that the SRFIs supported by the CHICKEN core are static >> and the only variable source of supported SRFIs is eggs, you can get a >> li

Re: New egg: SRFI-5: A compatible let form with signatures and rest arguments

On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 04:30:17 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit for publication a new egg: > > SRFI-5: A compatible let form with signatures and rest arguments > > Its documentation can be found here: [1] > > Its release-info is here: [2] > > test-new-egg gives it a clean

Re: New egg: srfi-135

On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 15:24:19 -0500 Wolfgang Corcoran-Mathe wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to submit a new egg, srfi-135, which provides SRFI 135 > immutable texts. I've run it past test-new-egg, which says > "Egg looks ok!". > > The egg source can be found at: > >

Re: New egg: SRFI-48: Intermediate Format Strings

On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 10:14:48 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit for publication a new egg: > > SRFI-48: Intermediate Format Strings > > Its documentation can be found here: [1] > > Its release-info is here: [2] > > test-new-egg gives it a clean bill of health. > >

Re: New egg: SRFI-207: String-notated bytevectors

On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 22:34:59 -0800 noosph...@mailc.net wrote: > I would like to submit a new egg for publication: > > SRFI-207: String-notated bytevectors > > The documentation for this egg is here: [1] > > The release-info is here: [2] > > test-new-egg has given it a clean bill of health. > >

Re: scm2wiki egg release

On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 21:05:49 +0100 ipc...@arcor.de wrote: > Argh! Had only tested with salmonella, which, strangely enough, didn't > trigger the issue. Anyway, should be fixed now. Sorry for the > inconvenience. No problem at all! Thanks for addressing the issue so quickly. Salmonella is

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >