Could I please get a code review on this function: I didn't write it,
but even if I had, I'd still want some of yall to look over it just to
make sure that it's as efficient and performant as far as getting as
much work done as possible with as little effort as possible: efficient,
lulz, nevermind. xD
On 08/12/2015 04:07 PM, Alexej Magura wrote:
Could I please get a code review on this function: I didn't write it,
but even if I had, I'd still want some of yall to look over it just to
make sure that it's as efficient and performant as far as getting as
much work done
Adds the following functions to the `versions' egg:
(define (local egg)
(irregex-replace
(format ~%)
(last
(string-split
(call-with-input-pipe
(string-append chicken-status egg)
read-all)
(define (remote egg #!optional url)
Is there a sequential version of /set!/, as in /setq/?
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
I'm getting a different error than your's, Erik, I get:
#;1 acsi: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/chicken/7/apropos.so:
undefined symbol: C_mutate
instead of
#;1 acsi: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/chicken/7/readline.so: undefined
symbol: C_enumerate_symbols
Fixed the problem; rolled out v4.1.0 of the Readline egg.
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Common Lisp has a uhh.. recursive(?) version of /do/ that defines its
variables in a manner similar to /let*/, in the sense that they're
defined sequentially: later variables can refer to those previous.
Example:
(do* ((a '(1 2 3 4 5) (cdr a))
(b (car a) (car a)))
((eq '() a))
the history searching functions.//However, the
history searching functions will be added back again in the next
(proper) release, which should be 3.1.
On 01/27/2015 11:10 AM, Evan Hanson wrote:
Hi Alexej,
My tuppence:
On 2015-01-27 4:01, Alexej Magura wrote:
I don't think I'll use the toplevel
the targeted package, or in our case module.
After uninterning /foo/, if I were to enter foo into the REPL to be
evaluated, it would throw an unbound variable exception.
On 02/02/2015 11:31 AM, Peter Bex wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 10:51:26AM -0700, Alexej Magura wrote:
Does Chicken have
Does Chicken have anything comparable to Common Lisp's /unintern/? I
thought that it might be under /##sys/, since other features present in
Common Lisp, but absent in Chicken are available under that namespace,
but it doesn't seem to be provided by that module/namespace.
Sorry, only just saw this. The API changed, hence the major version
bump. I'm certain that I updated the egg's wiki page to at least
include the new history file manager install function crap.
Also, you can just put /#f/ for your home directory and it should
automatically figure it out.
I can't find Jim Ursetto's email anywhere in the source for posix-extras
or on his website, although I suppose I could check the mailing list,
but I figured this'd be faster. EDIT: I checked the mailing list, and
it looks like Jim keeps his email hidden so it looks like this might be
the only
Does anybody have any custom svnwiki mode setups for Emacs? I googled
for a svnwiki mode but didn't find any there or in my Linux distro's repos.
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
I don't think I'll use the toplevel-command stuff after all: I can't
promise that the toplevel symbols readline exports won't get
overwritten, and I'm not entirely sure readline has any business
providing private toplevel symbols that are only applicable to it. It
might confuse
, though.
On 01/25/2015 04:02 PM, Matt Welland wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Alexej Magura agm2...@gmail.com
mailto:agm2...@gmail.com wrote:
Forgot to send my reply to the Chicken users mailing list too.
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: [Chicken
Forgot to send my reply to the Chicken users mailing list too.
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: [Chicken-users] readline egg v2.0 feedback
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 14:54:09 -0700
From: Alexej Magura agm2...@gmail.com
To: Matt Welland mattrwell...@gmail.com
If I have a function that returns a malloc'd pointer, or that needs to
have a buffer malloc'd, is it more idiomatic to (1) malloc and free in
the caller function (which is C's idiom, IIRC), or (2) malloc it in C
and then just return the pointer for free'ing by Chicken once the caller
function
Message
From: Alexej Magura agm2...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2014 04:00 AM
To: chicken-users@nongnu.org
Subject: [Chicken-users] readline egg v2.0 feedback
Hi, so as the new maintainer for the readline egg I wanted to reach
out to the community and see if anybody had any hacks
I think that a reasonable solution would be to (1) create the history
file if it does not already exist, (2) allow users to explicitly
disable/enable history keeping at any time, (3) simplify history file
installation to include only about a line of code, (4) add an option to
either wipe the
A paranoid function seems unnecessarily complicated to me. I think it'd
be better to provide users with simple tools with which they can build
bigger/better tools that suit their needs better than any
megalathon-tool that I can provide.
On 01/25/2015 01:48 PM, Matt Welland wrote:
I'm not
://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
--
Alexej Magura
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
or
utilities written in Chicken Scheme being distributed to end-users
currently, but the reason why I'm even checking it out is because it
does seem better suited to this task than a lot of other Lisp/Scheme
implementations.
On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 15:12 -0700, Alexej Magura wrote:
Yeah, offering eggs via any
What's Chicken Scheme licensed with? I did a brief search of the
website, but I didn't see anything about licensing; sspecifically, is
Chicken Scheme open source?
--
Alexej Magura
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https
Thanks, Matt.
--
Alexej Magura
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
if a symbol had been defined, but if there's already an egg that
provides this support or if it's built-in, I wanted to know so that I
wouldn't have to bother trying to rewrite said function.
--
Alexej Magura
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users
Thanks, Kon.
On 12/19/2014 11:45 PM, Kon Lovett wrote:
On Dec 19, 2014, at 10:38 PM, Alexej Magura agm2...@gmail.com
mailto:agm2...@gmail.com wrote:
In Common Lisp, clisp specifically, you can test whether a symbol has
been bound, that is interned, or not using boundp; is there a way
Is there a way to update eggs? I thought it might be chicken-install
-update-dbbut that seems to have a different effect. Is there no
zero-config means of updating eggs aside from manually updating them?
--
Alexej Magura
___
Chicken-users mailing
and merry Christmas!
--
Alexej Magura
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
and send patches and what-not :S
I even ran salmonella and it seemed to check out okay.
--
Alexej Magura
--- readline.scm 2014-12-11 01:57:27.105532179 -0700
+++ readline.scm.new 2014-12-11 01:41:14.946431613 -0700
@@ -102,6 +102,12 @@
gnu-readline-truncate-history
gnu-history-new
?
Not to sound stupid, but I'm not entirely sure what a hook procedure
is. It sounds like something that might deal with ports... or something
like a callback?
--
Alexej Magura
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https
On 12/11/2014 02:31 AM, Alexej Magura wrote:
Yeah, I loaded up my shell without my rcfile and the problem went
away, so something in my .zshrc/.zshenv is causing the problem.
So apparently running csi with rlwrap was messing with the readline
support, lulz. Commenting out the following
problems?
--
Alexej Magura
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
using (with-stty ‘(echo) read-char) seems to have no affect. I still have to
press *enter* in order for SIGINT to kill the program, that is the program
still hangs on (read-char), even when it gets a SIGINT.
--
Alexej Magura
Sent with Airmail
On April 6, 2014 at 10:32:46 PM, John Cowan (co
Lazy-ffi doesn’t build for Mac OS X, at least for 64bit. Problem originates in
the *lazy-ffi-support.scm* file. Either the *libffi* header file moved or this
egg wasn’t tested against Mac OS X using homebrew. Either way, the included
patch fixes the egg.
--
Alexej Magura
Sent with Airmail
it to work.
Anyone have any experience with this kind of issue; would using (read-line)
instead of (read-char) make a positive difference? (I doubt it would)
--
Alexej Magura
Sent with Airmail___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https
35 matches
Mail list logo
