On Mon, 27 Aug 2018 21:23:16 +0200 ko...@upyum.com wrote:
> [...]
> This has been fixed in SRFI-69 0.3, hope it works fine for you now!
> [...]
Hello,
thanks a lot, it works like a charm and allowed me to release a new
version of the protocol buffers egg :-)
Ciao,
Thomas
--
An altruist is
Hey! :)
This has been fixed in SRFI-69 0.3, hope it works fine for you now!
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 14:08:38 +0200 ko...@upyum.com wrote:
> [...]
> I checked the code and, for number types, only fixnums and flonums are
> explicitely handled, other numeric types trigger an incorrect recursion.
>
> It seems we forgot to add support for the new numeric types to srfi-69
> when
Thomas Chust wrote:
> this matters a lot: For one I have an application where it is crucial
> to be able to identify if the exact same object is passed more than
> once into certain functions and to be able to detect cyclic data
> structures – eq? and eq?-hash are supposed to be applicable to
>
On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 10:25:44 +0100 Chris Vine wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 03:40:26 +0200
> Thomas Chust wrote:
> > [...]
> > Then I realized that eq?-hash simply cannot be called on certain types
> > of objects:
> > [...]
> > $ csi
> > CHICKEN
> > (c) 2008-2018, The CHICKEN Team
> >
On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 03:40:26 +0200
Thomas Chust wrote:
> Hello,
>
> while trying to port some code from CHICKEN 4 to CHICKEN 5 I have just
> spent several hours tracking down a crash to a call of
> hash-table-ref/default for a table which happened to use eq? as the
> comparison function and was
Hello,
while trying to port some code from CHICKEN 4 to CHICKEN 5 I have just
spent several hours tracking down a crash to a call of
hash-table-ref/default for a table which happened to use eq? as the
comparison function and was loaded with various types of objects as
keys.
Then I realized that
