Andy Bennett andy...@ashurst.eu.org writes:
Hi,
Most modifications were done to chicken.css file, so changes are
immediately applicable to probably 90% of CHICKEN site (exceptions
are
api.call-cc.org [10] and bugs.call-cc.org [11]). To make the page
responsive to narrow screens (i.e.
Hi,
Most modifications were done to chicken.css file, so changes are
immediately applicable to probably 90% of CHICKEN site (exceptions
are
api.call-cc.org [10] and bugs.call-cc.org [11]). To make the page
responsive to narrow screens (i.e. mobiles) we would need to add
one
line of HTML
Hi again!
The prototype now runs on http://arthur.flnet.org:5280/
To test menu links, always go back to home page. The resonsive design can
be tested shrinking windows widths.
Best wishes,
Arthur
2015-07-27 2:53 GMT-03:00 Arthur Maciel arthurmac...@gmail.com:
Hi all!
Since Tim's first
Hi all!
Since Tim's first proposal I've been thinking a lot about CHICKEN's
website. Here are my two cents.
Homepage
- https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/621606/chicken-web-page/Homepage.png
-
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/621606/chicken-web-page/Homepage-Mobile.png
Eggs
-
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Daniel Ziltener dzilte...@lyrion.ch
wrote:
Maybe three or four (or more!) samples depicting typical features of
CHICKEN. These samples could be easily flipped through with a few
navigation buttons, they would carry a clear title per sample and a few
Hi Tim,
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 15:27:14 +0900 Tim van der Linden t...@shisaa.jp wrote:
3. Colors
Almost everyone pointed out that some texts are not very readable with
the current color scheme. I agree (sorry for that ;) ). Also, Mario,
yes I tried to incorporate the colors of the logo into
Hi All,
I don't even know if I ever participated actively in this list yet, but I'm an
occasional Chicken user (also I'm the guy behind the still-unfinished EDN
egg).
So I dare jump in and state my opinion :)
First of all, thanks for the work so far for designing the current mockup and
Hi, Tim--
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:27 PM, Tim van der Linden t...@shisaa.jp wrote:
1. Images of real life chickens
Yaroslav pointed out that the picture is currently a bit attention demanding,
so I will see to tone it down a bit. Maybe a different (brighter?) picture
might seek less
I support moving the download and documentation sections to the top
of the page. I always have trouble finding the link to the manual.
--Alex
On 2015-01-23 08:01, Bahman Movaqar wrote:
On 01/23/2015 07:25 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 07:17:17PM +0330, Bahman Movaqar wrote:
I
Hi, Bahman--
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Bahman Movaqar bah...@bahmanm.com wrote:
I strongly disagree with using CHICKEN for the website. Let's keep things
simple by using the right tool for the job.
I'd like to challenge that statement. As a (trying-to-be-professional)
web developer who
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Matt Gushee m...@gushee.net wrote:
These days there are some good static website generators out there, like
JBake and Jekyll, with which one can use HTML or asciidoc or Markdown to
generate a static website.
Sorry. Peter mentioned a static site generator, and
Hi, Tim and everyone--
I've been meaning to comment on this topic for some time, but I am
somewhat afraid to express my opinions on this list (I hasten to add
that that has nothing to do with anyone's behavior here - just my own
feeling of being hopelessly outclassed in this community. Plus the
Hi Tim,
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:24:18 +0900 Tim van der Linden t...@shisaa.jp wrote:
In the recent light of visual changes to the wiki, I have picked up an
old(er) idea to have my go at a redesign of the homepage (landing
page, front page, the-first-page, etc...).
I, for one, find our
Hi All
Forgive me for skipping out of the running Homepage design proposal thread with
top posting a new message. I simply want to distill the great comments I got so
far (thanks everyone!) on the first rough draft of the homepage, so we can keep
all the information together.
Let me run over
Yeah, that makes sense. I guess we're stuck with a server-side solution
unless we can get Chicken running on this little emulator
http://bellard.org/jslinux/. repl.it may be of inspiration!
Thanks,
K.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Yaroslav Tsarko eriktsa...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Kristian,
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 07:17:17PM +0330, Bahman Movaqar wrote:
I strongly disagree with using CHICKEN for the website. Let's keep
things simple by using the right tool for the job.
I think you're mixing up two things. One is the tool to generate the
website and the other is the online try
On 01/23/2015 07:25 PM, Peter Bex wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 07:17:17PM +0330, Bahman Movaqar wrote:
I strongly disagree with using CHICKEN for the website. Let's keep
things simple by using the right tool for the job.
I think you're mixing up two things. One is the tool to generate the
I strongly disagree with using CHICKEN for the website. Let's keep
things simple by using the right tool for the job.
These days there are some good static website generators out there, like
JBake and Jekyll, with which one can use HTML or asciidoc or Markdown to
generate a static website.
Hi all!
In the recent light of visual changes to the wiki, I have picked up an old(er)
idea to have my go at a redesign of the homepage (landing page, front page,
the-first-page, etc...).
I, for one, find our CHICKEN site charming. Yet many new folks see the homepage
more as the scrolling end
19 matches
Mail list logo
