Re: [Chicken-users] Parallel procedures in CHICKEN

’s the posix-semaphore egg. > > > > -Dan > > > > *From:* Chicken-users [mailto:chicken-users-bounces+dan= > ironoxide...@nongnu.org] *On Behalf Of *Arthur Maciel > *Sent:* December 28, 2016 7:47 AM > *To:* Kooda <ko...@upyum.com> > *Cc:* chicken-users <

Re: [Chicken-users] Parallel procedures in CHICKEN

;ko...@upyum.com> Cc: chicken-users <chicken-users@nongnu.org> Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Parallel procedures in CHICKEN Hi Kooda! Em 24 de dez de 2016 07:00, "Kooda" <ko...@upyum.com <mailto:ko...@upyum.com> > escreveu: On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 02:11:37 -0200 Art

Re: [Chicken-users] Parallel procedures in CHICKEN

Hi Matt! Thank you very much for the code! If I have any success I'll report here. Have a Happy New Year! Cheers, Arthur Em 28 de dez de 2016 15:29, "Matt Welland" escreveu: > Hi Arthur, > > You might find this bit of exploratory code useful: >

Re: [Chicken-users] Parallel procedures in CHICKEN

Hi Arthur, You might find this bit of exploratory code useful: http://www.kiatoa.com/cgi-bin/fossils/megatest/artifact/50100144d4ed2b54. It is an example of spawning off dozens of sub-processes and using nanomsg to communicate the data back. We needed to find changed files in gigs of data where

Re: [Chicken-users] Parallel procedures in CHICKEN

Hi Kooda! Em 24 de dez de 2016 07:00, "Kooda" escreveu: On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 02:11:37 -0200 Arthur Maciel wrote: > Is there a way to implement map, for-each and other procedures in a > parallel way so > > (use srfi-1) > (map (lambda (x) (+ x 1)) (iota

Re: [Chicken-users] Parallel procedures in CHICKEN

On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 02:11:37 -0200 Arthur Maciel wrote: > Is there a way to implement map, for-each and other procedures in a > parallel way so > > (use srfi-1) > (map (lambda (x) (+ x 1)) (iota 100) > > would automatically split the list into smaller lists according

[Chicken-users] Parallel procedures in CHICKEN

Hi! Is there a way to implement map, for-each and other procedures in a parallel way so (use srfi-1) (map (lambda (x) (+ x 1)) (iota 100) would automatically split the list into smaller lists according to the number of CPU cores and then gather the results back? Thanks in advance. Cheers,