On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 10:52:50AM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to use scsh-process pass bignums arguments.
>
> Unfortunately scsh-process's maybe->string does not recognize them as
> number?s and bails out.
>
> I can work around this easily, just use ->string at the invocation point.
> I'd rather like to fix the root cause and not work around. But how?
Unfortunately, there's no real way around it. One can add numbers as a
hard dependency to scsh-process, but if you follow that logic, you would
end up having to add it as a dependency to EVERY EGG EVER.
This is the disadvantage of having extended numbers bolted on, and the
main reason I wanted them in core.
Cheers,
Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
