Re: [Chicken-users] replacement for rlwrap on MS Windows, MinGW

2013-07-27 Thread Felix
From: Jim Ursetto zbignie...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] replacement for rlwrap on MS Windows, MinGW Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 01:29:45 -0500 If you're going to go the Emacs route, it's probably even better to use run-scheme from cmuscheme.el, as you may then evaluate Scheme

Re: [Chicken-users] replacement for rlwrap on MS Windows, MinGW

2013-07-26 Thread Christian Kellermann
* Claude Marinier claudem...@gmail.com [130726 01:35]: On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Christian Kellermann wrote: * Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org [130725 10:48]: * Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org [130725 10:29]: * Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl [130725 08:59]: On Wed, Jul 24, 2013

[Chicken-users] replacement for rlwrap on MS Windows, MinGW

2013-07-26 Thread Claude Marinier
Greetings, I have stumbled upon a potentially useful tool for Scheme development on MS Windows. It comes to us from the alien world of Lisp (it's actually written in C++, Daan just likes Lisp). http://www.daansystems.com/lispide/ So far, so good. I configured it to use its Scheme keyword

Re: [Chicken-users] replacement for rlwrap on MS Windows, MinGW

2013-07-25 Thread Peter Bex
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 06:57:56PM -0400, Claude Marinier wrote: Just to make sure we are talking about the same thing. The context is using the REPL on MS Windows. I prefer to use MinGW instead of Cygwin. Are you saying that csi can be built to use parley to provide better history and

Re: [Chicken-users] replacement for rlwrap on MS Windows, MinGW

2013-07-25 Thread Christian Kellermann
* Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl [130725 08:59]: On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 06:57:56PM -0400, Claude Marinier wrote: Just to make sure we are talking about the same thing. The context is using the REPL on MS Windows. I prefer to use MinGW instead of Cygwin. Are you saying that csi can be

Re: [Chicken-users] replacement for rlwrap on MS Windows, MinGW

2013-07-25 Thread Christian Kellermann
* Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org [130725 10:29]: * Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl [130725 08:59]: On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 06:57:56PM -0400, Claude Marinier wrote: Just to make sure we are talking about the same thing. The context is using the REPL on MS Windows. I prefer to use

Re: [Chicken-users] replacement for rlwrap on MS Windows, MinGW

2013-07-25 Thread Christian Kellermann
* Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org [130725 10:48]: * Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org [130725 10:29]: * Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl [130725 08:59]: On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 06:57:56PM -0400, Claude Marinier wrote: Just to make sure we are talking about the same thing.

Re: [Chicken-users] replacement for rlwrap on MS Windows, MinGW

2013-07-25 Thread Claude Marinier
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Christian Kellermann wrote: * Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org [130725 10:48]: * Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org [130725 10:29]: * Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl [130725 08:59]: On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 06:57:56PM -0400, Claude Marinier wrote: Just to

Re: [Chicken-users] replacement for rlwrap on MS Windows, MinGW

2013-07-25 Thread Claude Marinier
Using csi with parley works well on Linux (Debian Wheezy). On MS Windows, Cygwin and MinGW are stepping on each other's toes. I have to clean-up the mess. Time to re-visit the choice between Cygwin and MinGW. The concern some people have about the Cygwin DLL and the GPL does not affect me for

Re: [Chicken-users] replacement for rlwrap on MS Windows, MinGW

2013-07-25 Thread Michael Maul
On the emacs front. You don't have to even set up slime, if all you want is csi w/command history. Just start Emacs, Alt-X shell , type csi and your good to go. Ctrl-Up Arrow to access history. Setting up Slime is worth the effort, but not necessary. On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Claude

Re: [Chicken-users] replacement for rlwrap on MS Windows, MinGW

2013-07-24 Thread Peter Bex
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 09:01:47PM -0400, Claude Marinier wrote: ConEmu does not seem to provide additional command line editing but it supports ANSI escape sequences. One could do the same with Console2 in combination with ansicon but, yes, ConEmu is better. Linenoise uses just a few ANSI

Re: [Chicken-users] replacement for rlwrap on MS Windows, MinGW

2013-07-24 Thread Claude Marinier
On Wed, 24 Jul 2013, Peter Bex wrote: On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 09:01:47PM -0400, Claude Marinier wrote: ConEmu does not seem to provide additional command line editing but it supports ANSI escape sequences. One could do the same with Console2 in combination with ansicon but, yes, ConEmu is

Re: [Chicken-users] replacement for rlwrap on MS Windows, MinGW

2013-07-23 Thread Stephen Eilert
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Claude Marinier claudem...@gmail.comwrote: Bonjour, Console2 (see URL below) is a reasonable replacement for 'rlwrap' or 'rlfe' when using csi on MS Windows, MinGW. Go to Edit / Settings and change the shell to csi.

Re: [Chicken-users] replacement for rlwrap on MS Windows, MinGW

2013-07-23 Thread Claude Marinier
ConEmu does not seem to provide additional command line editing but it supports ANSI escape sequences. One could do the same with Console2 in combination with ansicon but, yes, ConEmu is better. Linenoise uses just a few ANSI escape sequences which should work with ConEmu.

Re: [Chicken-users] replacement for rlwrap on MS Windows, MinGW

2013-07-21 Thread Kooda
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 02:42:12PM -0400, Claude Marinier wrote: Bonjour, Console2 (see URL below) is a reasonable replacement for 'rlwrap' or 'rlfe' when using csi on MS Windows, MinGW. Go to Edit / Settings and change the shell to csi. http://sourceforge.net/projects/console/

[Chicken-users] replacement for rlwrap on MS Windows, MinGW

2013-07-19 Thread Claude Marinier
Bonjour, Console2 (see URL below) is a reasonable replacement for 'rlwrap' or 'rlfe' when using csi on MS Windows, MinGW. Go to Edit / Settings and change the shell to csi. http://sourceforge.net/projects/console/ Actually, it's not that good. Does anyone have a good replacement for