Re: [Chicken-users] using flymake with chicken

2012-11-24 Thread Felix
From: Daniel Leslie d...@ironoxide.ca Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] using flymake with chicken Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 14:09:34 -0800 Oh excellent! You may be able to remove the need for the shell script by running something like: (shell-command-to-string (format csi -SAv \%s\ || true

Re: [Chicken-users] using flymake with chicken

2012-11-24 Thread Felix
Also: is there a way to show the error message? I found flymake-display-err-menu-for-current-line, but that gives an annoying popup with the message, which is cut off so you can't read the most important parts. Oh, look:

Re: [Chicken-users] using flymake with chicken

2012-11-24 Thread John Cowan
Felix scripsit: There is nothing like emacs. 'There's nothing like eating hay when you're faint,' he [the White King] remarked to her [Alice], as he munched away. 'I should think throwing cold water over you would be better,' Alice suggested: 'or some sal-volatile [smelling-salts, ammonium

Re: [Chicken-users] using flymake with chicken

2012-11-24 Thread Peter Bex
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 08:21:05PM +0100, Felix wrote: Also: is there a way to show the error message? I found flymake-display-err-menu-for-current-line, but that gives an annoying popup with the message, which is cut off so you can't read the most important parts. Oh, look:

Re: [Chicken-users] using flymake with chicken

2012-11-23 Thread Peter Bex
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 08:27:32PM +0100, Peter Bex wrote: Suggestions are welcome. Flymake doesn't have default key bindings for going to the next/prev error. Maybe the mode can set up something like M-n and M-p to step between errors? Or does it make more sense to let the user do this so

Re: [Chicken-users] using flymake with chicken

2012-11-23 Thread Daniel Leslie
Oh excellent! You may be able to remove the need for the shell script by running something like: (shell-command-to-string (format csi -SAv \%s\ || true option-or-filename)) Thanks, -Dan On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 11:05 AM, Felix fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org wrote: Hello!