Hello,
I ran into a little problem when working with the r6rs-bytevectors egg,
which provides an r7rs implementation of (r6rs bytevectors). The
bytevector-copy! procedure has a different call signature in r6 than in
r7, and I found that as r6rs-bytevectors is currently written, its
bytevector-cop
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:51 PM, John J Foerch
wrote:
I ran into a little problem when working with the r6rs-bytevectors egg,
> which provides an r7rs implementation of (r6rs bytevectors). The
> bytevector-copy! procedure has a different call signature in r6 than in
> r7, and I found that as r6r
Hi John,
You're quite right, this was indeed a bug relating to which bindings are
implicitly available within R7RS libraries.
This should be fixed in 0.0.5, just released and available shortly. If you
could have a go with that version and let me know if you still run into
problems, I'd appreciate
John Cowan writes:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:51 PM, John J Foerch
> wrote:
>
> I ran into a little problem when working with the r6rs-bytevectors
> egg,
> which provides an r7rs implementation of (r6rs bytevectors). The
> bytevector-copy! procedure has a different call signatur
Evan Hanson writes:
> Hi John,
>
> You're quite right, this was indeed a bug relating to which bindings are
> implicitly available within R7RS libraries.
>
> This should be fixed in 0.0.5, just released and available shortly. If you
> could have a go with that version and let me know if you still
John J Foerch writes:
> Evan Hanson writes:
>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> You're quite right, this was indeed a bug relating to which bindings are
>> implicitly available within R7RS libraries.
>>
>> This should be fixed in 0.0.5, just released and available shortly. If you
>> could have a go with that ve
I recently upgraded my moosefs install and now have issues compiling my
Chicken based project "Megatest" on moosefs. I've asked for help on the
moosefs email list but this got me thinking, what could my compilation of
Megatest possibly be doing that pushes the filesystem? So I thought I'd try
on so