Re: So, I noticed that the ioctl egg doesn't compile on OpenBSD

[T. Kurt Bond]

That worked!  The egg that needed it (schemepunk, not distributed on
eggs.call-cc.org) compiled and my use of it (which has nothing to do with
ioctl) worked fine!  Thanks!

On Thu, Dec 14, 2023, 5:26 PM  wrote:

> > It fails because TIOCSTI is undefined.  OpenBSD removed it for security
> > reasons.
> >
> > How could that egg be modified to allow it to compile on OpenBSD?
>
> Hi! Thanks for reporting this - I have added a dummy definition (ioctl 0.4)
> for OpenBSD.
>
>
> felix
>
>

Re: So, I noticed that the ioctl egg doesn't compile on OpenBSD

[felix . winkelmann]

> It fails because TIOCSTI is undefined.  OpenBSD removed it for security
> reasons.
>
> How could that egg be modified to allow it to compile on OpenBSD?

Hi! Thanks for reporting this - I have added a dummy definition (ioctl 0.4)
for OpenBSD.


felix

Re: So, I noticed that the ioctl egg doesn't compile on OpenBSD

[paul wisehart]

On Thu, Dec 14, 2023, at 4:36 PM, T. Kurt Bond wrote:
> It fails because TIOCSTI is undefined.  OpenBSD removed it for security 
> reasons.
> 
> How could that egg be modified to allow it to compile on OpenBSD?
> 

Ignore this if it's noise, but this feels related to OpenBSD recently disabling 
syscalls.

So, I noticed that the ioctl egg doesn't compile on OpenBSD

[T. Kurt Bond]

It fails because TIOCSTI is undefined.  OpenBSD removed it for security
reasons.

How could that egg be modified to allow it to compile on OpenBSD?

-- 
T. Kurt Bond, tkurtb...@gmail.com, https://tkurtbond.github.io