I know this is only for complaints ;) but I like the present look.
The clues as to where each omnibox suggestion comes from are great,
clear and useful!
- Itai
On May 14, 3:22 pm, Ben Goodger (Google) b...@chromium.org wrote:
I have adjusted the transparency slightly, and disabled it
[-chromium-reviews, +chromium-dev]
(take 2)
From their website, «To use Google Mock, you will need the
TR1http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technical_Report_1 tuple
C++ library installed.» and not directly boost. Up to now, chromium source
tree assumed defined(_MSC_VER) == No TR1, which is not exactly
One other idea to explore...what about reimplementing tr1::tuple using
base::Tuple? It'd be a pretty naughty hack (adding something to the tr1::
namespace), but for the limited use-case of gmock, it could be good enough?
-Albert
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel
And to correct an error I made, the feature pack is included in the SP1 so
there's no reason to download an additional 320 megs :)
And since we require the service pack 1 on VS2008 anyway, we can
assume(_MSCVER = 1500) means TR1 is available.
So I guess it's fine to not hack out a tr1::tuple out
If this is the only reason gmock needs boost, it seems like a better
idea would be to push a copy of tuple.h into gmock and submit a patch
to make it more self-contained in the first place.
-scott
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Albert J. Wong (王重傑)
ajw...@chromium.org wrote:
One other idea
Am I alone to have the down arrow in See XX recent pages in your history
containing YY make me think that if I hover on it, the menu will drop down
with more results?
I guess it's an MS office side-effect but that would be an expectation from
a lot of people.
Also, the drop down text is
With snapshot.
Look the for
It's on vista with classic theme.
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@chromium.orgwrote:
Am I alone to have the down arrow in See XX recent pages in your history
containing YY make me think that if I hover on it, the menu will drop down
with
[ +zhanyong ]
I chatted with Zhanyong about both swapping out tr1::tuple, and about
removing the svn:external reference in the repository.
The gmock actions use tr1:tuple as part of the public interface for defining
new actions. Thus, changing the tuple implementation would basically mean
that
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Albert J. Wong (王重傑)
ajw...@chromium.orgwrote:
[ +zhanyong ]
I chatted with Zhanyong about both swapping out tr1::tuple, and about
removing the svn:external reference in the repository.
The gmock actions use tr1:tuple as part of the public interface for
2009/5/15 Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.org
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Albert J. Wong (王重傑)
ajw...@chromium.org wrote:
[ +zhanyong ]
I chatted with Zhanyong about both swapping out tr1::tuple, and about
removing the svn:external reference in the repository.
The gmock actions
I have spent some time playing around the new release of Chrome,
especially building user preference system using the bookmarking and
script/extension communication aspects. I have to say it is not
reliable enough yet to build a real system.
Generally there are several concerns as mentioned
Hi Jack,
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:05 PM, jack js2...@gmail.com wrote:
I have spent some time playing around the new release of Chrome,
especially building user preference system using the bookmarking and
script/extension communication aspects. I have to say it is not
reliable enough yet to
*Not so much in the extensions and bookmarks area here, but, have you
noticed that weird behavior where clicking on a toolstrip button makes
Chrome focus on an arbitrary tab all of a sudden?* *
*☆PhistucK
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 00:18, Aaron Boodman a...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Jack,
On Fri,
Yeah I have noticed that. There is a bug open for it:
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=11901
I agree it is weird :).
- a
2009/5/15 PhistucK phist...@gmail.com:
Not so much in the extensions and bookmarks area here, but, have you noticed
that weird behavior where clicking
2009/5/15 Zhanyong Wan (λx.x x) w...@google.com
2009/5/15 Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.org:
2009/5/15 Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.org
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Albert J. Wong (王重傑)
ajw...@chromium.org wrote:
[ +zhanyong ]
I chatted with Zhanyong about both
2009/5/15 Zhanyong Wan (λx.x x) w...@google.com
2009/5/15 Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.org:
2009/5/15 Zhanyong Wan (λx.x x) w...@google.com
2009/5/15 Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.org:
2009/5/15 Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.org
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at
2009/5/15 Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.org:
2009/5/15 Zhanyong Wan (λx.x x) w...@google.com
2009/5/15 Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.org:
2009/5/15 Zhanyong Wan (λx.x x) w...@google.com
2009/5/15 Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.org:
2009/5/15 Nicolas Sylvain
Hi All,
I'm seeking a way to trigger destruction (or reference decrement) of a C++
object attached to a V8 object when the V8 object is destroyed. For
instance, consider the following code where I create and return a new V8
object in a function template callback:
static v8::Handlev8::Value
18 matches
Mail list logo
