I have followed up and/or closed the above issues as appropriate.
I expect Glen will update the status for http://crbug.com/5354 as soon
as he has committed the patch.
On Jul 8, 8:31 pm, Thiago Farina thiago.far...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi dhhwai,
http://crbug.com/661http://crbug.com/5288
For
I did a WebKit DEPs roll tonight to pick up the next stage of V8Proxy
cleanup and promptly lost the ability to see the buildbot:
blockquote
Proxy Error
The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
The proxy server could not handle the request GET /buildbot/waterfall/.
I can see the buildbot intermittenly now, and it looks like Windows
needs a clobber. Unfortunately, I don't see a way to do that on the
buildbot page... :(
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:24 AM, Adam Barthaba...@chromium.org wrote:
I did a WebKit DEPs roll tonight to pick up the next stage of
I clobbered the WebKit FYI builds. Looks like someone else beat me to the
main windows builds.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Adam Barth aba...@chromium.org wrote:
I can see the buildbot intermittenly now, and it looks like Windows
needs a clobber. Unfortunately, I don't see a way to do
linux2 there is the platform, as in linux with kernel 2.*.
import sys
print sys.platform
linux2
Nicolas
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 12:34 AM, PhistucK phist...@gmail.com wrote:
Should this not be changed also? m_webkit_linux_v8_latest =
chromium_factory.ChromiumFactory('src/build',
Thanks for the link of terms, and for your confirmation.
From what I can see in the terms, Chromium is primarily covered by the
BSD and LGPL licences, so I can't see a problem there. I guess my
primary concern is with copyright if I am reworking the Chromium
browser part of the project to meet
Not really, the open source Chrome is Chromium for a reason, so you could
use it.As far as I know, there are no closed copyrights for the Chromium
logo or name.
(Could be mistaking, though.)
☆PhistucK
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 16:46, Kruncher leaha...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the link of
Well, the Chromium _source code_ is open source.
But my guess is I don't think you can use the Chromium name nor logo
in any personally distributed software. Besides, I don't expect that
you will since you want to make your own commercial software package.
On Jul 9, 6:56 am, PhistucK
Thanks Jeremy.
Adam
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:50 AM, Jeremy Orlowjor...@chromium.org wrote:
I clobbered the WebKit FYI builds. Looks like someone else beat me to the
main windows builds.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Adam Barth aba...@chromium.org wrote:
I can see the buildbot
What would be the best place to put dialog message strings,
chromium_strings or generated_resources.grd?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
Jay's on the ball and has updated http://crbug.com/15833
On Jul 9, 7:43 am, Thiago Farina thiago.far...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks dhhwai!
I found another one.
This issue was committed, but the status is assigned, so I'm not sure
if it has to be marked as fixed:http://crbug.com/15833
On Jul
I think there is another issue:
http://crbug.com/3215
On Jul 9, 1:27 pm, dhhwai d...@chromium.org wrote:
Jay's on the ball and has updatedhttp://crbug.com/15833
On Jul 9, 7:43 am, Thiago Farina thiago.far...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks dhhwai!
I found another one.
This issue was
Thiago, I believe a better approach is replying back on that issue tracker
instead of in dev mailing list. The owner of the bug will receive an email
if you reply stating if it has been fixed.
-- Mohamed Mansour
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Thiago Farina thiago.far...@gmail.comwrote:
I
I reproduced the steps in this issue, but the next and previous
buttons worked as expected, in version 2.0.172.33.
http://crbug.com/6054
On Jul 9, 2:03 pm, Thiago Farina thiago.far...@gmail.com wrote:
I think there is another issue:http://crbug.com/3215
On Jul 9, 1:27 pm, dhhwai
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Thiago Farina thiago.far...@gmail.comwrote:
I reproduced the steps in this issue, but the next and previous
buttons worked as expected, in version 2.0.172.33.
http://crbug.com/6054
Please, stop mailing chromium-dev about individual bugs and just post
Sorry I already deleted.
On Jul 9, 2:42 pm, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Thiago Farina thiago.far...@gmail.comwrote:
I reproduced the steps in this issue, but the next and previous
buttons worked as expected, in version 2.0.172.33.
Hello everybody,
I am using Chromium on Linux (build 20134).
Nearly everything works for me (including Flash), but I've recently
written a page that works like a charm in Firefox but not in Chromium.
The page is at http://www.linuxclubradio.tk/picostreamer/?setlang=en
The matter is that every 5
Peter some times the issues hasn't an owner, so in this cases I can't
simply answer in the issue. Like this: http://crbug.com/3078
On Jul 9, 2:43 pm, Thiago Farina thiago.far...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry I already deleted.
On Jul 9, 2:42 pm, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Thu,
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Thiago Farina thiago.far...@gmail.comwrote:
Peter some times the issues hasn't an owner, so in this cases I can't
simply answer in the issue. Like this: http://crbug.com/3078
It doesn't matter whether the issue has an owner. Eventually we will triage
and note
So in the next cases, I will only comment in the issue, and wait for
some answer.
On Jul 9, 3:25 pm, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Thiago Farina thiago.far...@gmail.comwrote:
Peter some times the issues hasn't an owner, so in this cases I can't
Hi all,
I'm trying to add a file which needs to be processed autoconf-style at
compile time. It's a script with things like @@FOO@@ that are values
known at the time gyp runs, but which should actually be substituted
during the compile when the .in version of the script is processed and
written
You probably want 'actions' - these run at compile time. You can
find examples of these all over our tree.
Mark
Mike Mammarella wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to add a file which needs to be processed autoconf-style at
compile time. It's a script with things like @@FOO@@ that are values
Sounds like you're looking for an 'actions' or 'rules'.Look at
src/webkit/webkit.gyp or src/chrome/chrome.gyp
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Mike Mammarella m...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to add a file which needs to be processed autoconf-style at
compile time. It's a script
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Thiago Farina thiago.far...@gmail.comwrote:
because the firefox
has this feature, many users from firefox will want this too in
chrome.
This is rarely a reason we justify feature additions (I have no idea which
feature you're working on).
In general, for both
It seems like status is a reserved word (so it does not give you the
HTMLObject you wanted, but something internal that cannot be reached), try
to use some other name.
☆PhistucK
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 09:37, Alessandro rinaldi.al...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am using Chromium on
Since yesterday, all of the Mac builds in BigHouse (including main
Buildbot builds and tryserver builds) have been supported by an extra
set of distccd servers running on nearby Linux systems. The only
impact should be that builds should be faster now, since there are
more CPUs available to do
Hi all,
I've been poking around quite a bit recently in the WebKit JS
bindings/constructor code, trying to make some sense of their widespread use
of the lexicalGlobalObject() - basically, it seems like looking at the
lexicalGlobalObject() is seldom what they actually want, because it means
that
[now, from property email address]
+1 on creating a i18n mechanism that is distinct from JSTemplate.-1 on using
the same syntax (or at least the same directives) as JSTemplate.
First, I personally like JSTemplate and think it is well suited for doing
dynamic HTML composition (rather than
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:04 PM, Drew Wilsonatwil...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi all,
I've been poking around quite a bit recently in the WebKit JS
bindings/constructor code, trying to make some sense of their widespread use
of the lexicalGlobalObject() - basically, it seems like looking at the
For an example of what this means, you can look at
v8/test/cctest/test-api.cc and look for GetCallingContext.
-- Mads
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Mads Sig Agera...@chromium.org wrote:
Drew,
quick answer: When you use V8 you have to enter a context before
giving V8 some code to execute.
I have a proposal for a rename of these functions. GetCurrent() and
GetEntered() make sense when you understand the underlying V8
mechanism, but I think that the concept of a stack of contexts is more
readily understandable to some random engineer walking in off the
street.
What if we renamed
I support this. It look me a while to get my mind wrapped around
this, especially when reading JSC / V8 bindings code side-by-side.
Aligning with the JSC names would be even better.
Adam
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Aaron Boodmana...@chromium.org wrote:
I have a proposal for a rename of
2009/7/9 Rafael Weinstein rafa...@chromium.org
However, because some of our existing pages use JSTemplate both for
injecting strings and for doing dynamic composition, the jst directives can
colide. Consider the following:
div jsselect=items
span jscontent=i18n_downloadDownload: /span
To me dynamic and lexical makes no sense, so I don't think we should
go there. Since you 'enter' a context through the API and you alway
have a current context when executing code, I find the current
terminology consistent with what is going on and consistent with the
naming in the rest of the
I'm pursuing the js solution since it buys a performance boost in the
short term. It uses l10n-values and l10n-content which are almost
identical to jsvalues and jscontent except that it does not allow
arbitrary expressions.
I expect to send out a finished CL today.
2009/7/9 Rafael Weinstein
It could be that the current names make sense if you work on v8, but
don't if you work on a browser. Perhaps this naming scheme could be
chromium-specific?
- a
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Mads Sig Agera...@chromium.org wrote:
To me dynamic and lexical makes no sense, so I don't think we
We already have an abstraction layer around these calls. We can
change names in V8Proxy / whatever these functions end up after
V8Proxy dissolves.
Adam
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Aaron Boodmana...@chromium.org wrote:
It could be that the current names make sense if you work on v8, but
I am landing a GRD change. You may need to clobber.
-- Elliot
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
Please just make a whitespace change to the grd.
- a
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Elliot Glaysher
(Chromium)e...@chromium.org wrote:
I am landing a GRD change. You may need to clobber.
-- Elliot
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Evan Martine...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 10:46 AM, nakroyoav.zilberb...@gmail.com wrote:
the reason i think one from chrome is the best is because these
changes could affect MAC and UNIX as well
Regarding incremental linking: I don't believe
Fantastic. I'll look forward to using it.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Erik Arvidsson a...@chromium.org wrote:
I'm pursuing the js solution since it buys a performance boost in the
short term. It uses l10n-values and l10n-content which are almost
identical to jsvalues and jscontent except
Hi,
I periodically have issues loading the avcodec.dll. I have build the
avcodec.dll that contains the following H.264 exports: (I did have to
disable mmx which I am not sure why as of yet)
461 1CC 00174100 ff_h264_decode_nal
462 1CD 0018AD20 ff_h264_decode_picture_parameter_set
463 1CE
Before we jump into debugging, where did you get your FFmpeg source code?
The version and building instructions we use are documented here:
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/deps/third_party/ffmpeg/
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/deps/third_party/mingw/
Andrew
On Thu, Jul
Also make sure the filename is correct, it is avcodec-52.dll.
Alpha
2009/7/9 Andrew Scherkus scher...@chromium.org
Before we jump into debugging, where did you get your FFmpeg source code?
The version and building instructions we use are documented here:
I will try rebuilding the ffmpeg dll's from scratch after downloading
the code again. Perhaps setting a asm int 3's inside of avcodec dll
to see if I can see what is going on.
Thanks for the help.
-- Rich
From: richard winterton rrwinter...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 5:14 PM
Subject:
On Jul 9, 2009, at 11:44 AM, PhistucK wrote:
It seems like status is a reserved word (so it does not give you
the HTMLObject you wanted, but something internal that cannot be
reached), try to use some other name.
Try declaring it with var on first usage and see if that helps. (You
Hi,
I manage to build debug version of 3.0.190.2 on WinXP with VS2005. After I
hit F5 to run Chrome, VS output a couple of lines about dlls loaded and
followed by lines below:
...
'chrome.exe': Loaded 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\imm32.dll', No symbols loaded.
'chrome.exe': Loaded
Is it possible to continue posting these? external developers have requested it.
-- Evan Stade
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Peter Kastingpkast...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 6:19 PM, Glenn Wilson gwil...@chromium.org wrote:
Meeting notes from February 9, 2009 are now
We stopped posting because (a) the notes seemed not to be very useful out of
context and (b) removing any Google-specific info, though it was minimal,
was pretty labor intensive. I think it may be more productive to try to keep
some public roadmaps and tasklists updated. Ian is working on creating
49 matches
Mail list logo
