[chromium-dev] Re: LTTF helping the GTTF make cycle times *minutes* faster

2009-10-16 Thread Yuta Kitamura
I'm also looking at LayoutTests/fast/css/large-list-of-rules-crash.html. Yuta 2009/10/16 Yuta Kitamura yu...@chromium.org I'm currently working on tests under LayoutTests/http/tests/navigation/. Thanks, Yuta 2009/10/16 Ojan Vafai o...@google.com There are a lot of tests that consistently

[chromium-dev] [announce] chromium's buildbot now has automated monitoring of performance test regressions

2009-10-16 Thread Chase Phillips
Chromium's buildbot now provides *automated monitoring of performance test regressions*. This new monitoring system alerts committers and sheriffs on the buildbot waterfall of regressions and speedups in select performance tests. *What this means if you're a committer:* When you land a CL that

[chromium-dev] Re: Running applications in chrome with javascript

2009-10-16 Thread Daniel Wagner-Hall
NPAPI lets you execute native code: http://code.google.com/chrome/extensions/npapi.html, https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Plugins On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 8:16 AM, David palm...@gmail.com wrote: nobody knows how to run an exe in chrome... is it possible? thanks! On 13 oct, 17:35, David

[chromium-dev] Re: LTTF helping the GTTF make cycle times *minutes* faster

2009-10-16 Thread Yuzo Fujishima
I've looked into LayoutTests/fast/loader/local-JavaScript-from-local.html and found a bug in the test. I'll submit a patch to WebKit. Yuzo On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Yuta Kitamura yu...@chromium.org wrote: I'm also looking at LayoutTests/fast/css/large-list-of-rules-crash.html. Yuta

[chromium-dev] Re: SVN Stable Tree Path for 3.0.195.25

2009-10-16 Thread PhistucK
Your question was probably answered already (or you have given up), but the releases folder was updated, it seems and the sources you were looking for are there now. The specific one you were looking for - http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/releases/3.0.195.25/ The latest one -

[chromium-dev] Re: [announce] chromium's buildbot now has automated monitoring of performance test regressions

2009-10-16 Thread Anton Muhin
Thanks a lot, Chase, all, that's really awesome. yours, anton. On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Chase Phillips ch...@chromium.org wrote: Chromium's buildbot now provides automated monitoring of performance test regressions.  This new monitoring system alerts committers and sheriffs on the

[chromium-dev] Re: Please confirm the bug (some bitmaps aren/t displayed)

2009-10-16 Thread progame
it has to be somebody's task to read *every* unconfirmed misc issues i have done that for the issues posted since i got the privileges (in June) up to September and tagged/CCed what i could... but now that my semester is starting I no longer have enough time to do that (it's a whole day of work

[chromium-dev] Re: Please confirm the bug (some bitmaps aren/t displayed)

2009-10-16 Thread Erik Kay
Thanks for your help over the summer. We really appreciate it, and whatever time you can continue to contribute during the semester. Erik p.s. And thanks to the others who have been helping triage bugs. It goes to show that you don't have to write code to have an impact on the project! On

[chromium-dev] Re: [announce] chromium's buildbot now has automated monitoring of performance test regressions

2009-10-16 Thread Patrick Johnson
Wow, this is really cool, and something I've wanted for a long time. Nice work! Patrick On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:35 AM, Chase Phillips ch...@chromium.org wrote: Chromium's buildbot now provides *automated monitoring of performance test regressions*. This new monitoring system alerts

[chromium-dev] Re: [announce] chromium's buildbot now has automated monitoring of performance test regressions

2009-10-16 Thread Ian Fette
Thanks to Chase and everyone who helped getting this up and running. 2009/10/16 Chase Phillips ch...@chromium.org Chromium's buildbot now provides *automated monitoring of performance test regressions*. This new monitoring system alerts committers and sheriffs on the buildbot waterfall of

[chromium-dev] Creating a flakey-test bot?

2009-10-16 Thread 王重傑
What do people think about creating a bot for isolating flakey tests from each major category of tests? The idea would be to try and move the flaky tests onto one bot so that the signal-to-noise ratio on the other bots gets better. Also, with layout tests that might flake via timeouts, you can

[chromium-dev] Re: Change to default build architecture

2009-10-16 Thread Lei Zhang
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Michael Moss mm...@chromium.org wrote: If you want to continue building 32-bit on 64-bit hosts, you can force it by setting GYP_DEFINES=target_arch=ia32 in the environment. FYI, I think $GYP_DEFINES overrides ~/.gyp/includes.gypi. You may get unexpected results

[chromium-dev] Sheriff help from 3:30 to 4:30 today

2009-10-16 Thread Munjal Doshi
Can someone perform sheriff duties from 3:30 to 4:30 PM today? I have a meeting which I would like to attend during that time. Thanks -Munjal --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options,

[chromium-dev] Re: LTTF helping the GTTF make cycle times *minutes* faster

2009-10-16 Thread Dirk Pranke
Hm. I actually wrote that test, and I'm surprised that it's timing out. I'll take a look at it as well. It is a slow test, because it's basically trying to reproduce a stack overflow. -- Dirk On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Yuta Kitamura yu...@chromium.org wrote: I'm also looking at 

[chromium-dev] Please update svn:ignore for gyp changes

2009-10-16 Thread Peter Kasting
After a recent sync I now have a large number of .rules/.sln/.vcproj files in chrome_frame/. Someone changed the gyp files in a way that introduced these without adding them to svn:ignore. When you change a gyp file, you should update svn:ignore on the directory in which all your new

[chromium-dev] weird Visual Studio link error, will clobber fix it?

2009-10-16 Thread Paweł Hajdan Jr .
I'm consistently getting this error when linking (fails 57 times when compiling the entire chrome.sln): 2shell32.lib(shguid.obj) : fatal error LNK1103: debugging information corrupt; recompile module I'm using Visual Studio 2005, fresh checkout. Should I just try clobber?

[chromium-dev] Re: Please update svn:ignore for gyp changes

2009-10-16 Thread Marc-Antoine Ruel
I'm doing it, I have a change pending, I was waiting for the tree to reopen... M-A On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote: After a recent sync I now have a large number of .rules/.sln/.vcproj files in chrome_frame/.  Someone changed the gyp files in a way

[chromium-dev] Re: Please update svn:ignore for gyp changes

2009-10-16 Thread Marc-Antoine Ruel
... and by the time I synced, it was closed again. :) On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@chromium.org wrote: I'm doing it, I have a change pending, I was waiting for the tree to reopen... M-A On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:

[chromium-dev] Re: weird Visual Studio link error, will clobber fix it?

2009-10-16 Thread Marc-Antoine Ruel
... more hotfixes for you to install http://dev.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/build-instructions-windows On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Paweł Hajdan Jr. phajdan...@chromium.org wrote: I'm consistently getting this error when linking (fails 57 times when compiling the entire chrome.sln):

[chromium-dev] Re: LTTF helping the GTTF make cycle times *minutes* faster

2009-10-16 Thread Ojan Vafai
Thanks for everyone's help. Good overnight progress. 6 media tests skipped. 2 tests marked SLOW. 5 assigned. 12 unassigned general tests. 10 unassigned Mac plugin tests. Any takers? WIN/LINUX/MAC LayoutTests/fast/dom/cssTarget-crash.html LayoutTests/fast/events/add-event-without-document.html

[chromium-dev] New Tab Cold 20% perf regression on xp-release

2009-10-16 Thread Erik Arvidsson
The performance for New Tab Cold has regressed without about 20% sometime before rev28918. http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/perf/xp-release/new-tab-ui-cold/report.html?history=150 The graph tells us that it is something in the rendering path. My main suspect atm is the change to use system

[chromium-dev] Re: New Tab Cold 20% perf regression on xp-release

2009-10-16 Thread Nicolas Sylvain
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Erik Arvidsson a...@chromium.org wrote: The performance for New Tab Cold has regressed without about 20% sometime before rev28918. This seems to be when i changed the hardware where this test is running. Where is the reference build? Nicolas

[chromium-dev] Re: New Tab Cold 20% perf regression on xp-release

2009-10-16 Thread Erik Arvidsson
According to Evan this was caused by Tony's fix to use a profile with recent data. http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?view=revrevision=28924 It is still strange that it did no affect Mac or Linux. On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 14:39, Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.org wrote: On Fri, Oct 16,

[chromium-dev] Re: LTTF helping the GTTF make cycle times *minutes* faster

2009-10-16 Thread Jeremy Orlow
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@google.com wrote: Thanks for everyone's help. Good overnight progress. 6 media tests skipped. 2 tests marked SLOW. 5 assigned. 12 unassigned general tests. 10 unassigned Mac plugin tests. Any takers? WIN/LINUX/MAC

[chromium-dev] Re: LTTF helping the GTTF make cycle times *minutes* faster

2009-10-16 Thread Ojan Vafai
Sweet. Down to 10 unassigned. Promise I'll stop spamming chromium-dev soon. :) WIN/LINUX/MAC LayoutTests/fast/dom/cssTarget-crash.html LayoutTests/fast/events/add-event-without-document.html LayoutTests/http/tests/history/back-to-post.php

[chromium-dev] Re: LTTF helping the GTTF make cycle times *minutes* faster

2009-10-16 Thread Erik Arvidsson
I looked at LayoutTests/fast/dom/cssTarget-crash.html earlier. It is a webkit bug related to the frame loader so I was planning to take another look when abarth was done with the frame loader refactoring. On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 15:09, Ojan Vafai o...@google.com wrote: Sweet. Down to 10

[chromium-dev] Re: LTTF helping the GTTF make cycle times *minutes* faster

2009-10-16 Thread Andrew Scherkus
Interesting development with the media timeout failures. Whenever you start skipping some, different media layout tests start timing out! Looks like there's some nasty threading/racing issue at play... http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=25094 On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 3:45 PM,