[chromium-dev] Re: [chromium-reviews] Add the cmdline -open-in-new-window switch

2009-12-12 Thread Peter Kasting
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Clemens Fruhwirth clem...@endorphin.orgwrote: http://codereview.chromium.org/464060 adds the small one-line feature to open an URL in a new window from commandline Can any review these changes? Please read

Re: [chromium-dev] Re: [chromium-reviews] Add the cmdline -open-in-new-window switch

2009-12-12 Thread Evan Martin
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 1:01 AM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote: On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Clemens Fruhwirth clem...@endorphin.org wrote: http://codereview.chromium.org/464060 adds the small one-line feature to open an URL in a new window from commandline I wonder if you

Re: [chromium-dev] Re: [chromium-reviews] Add the cmdline -open-in-new-window switch

2009-12-12 Thread Mike Mammarella
At least on Linux, this is currently a feature that we visibly lack compared to Firefox (and pretty much every other browser). In GNOME browsers tell the desktop environment how to open links in new windows as well as new tabs, or that they can't do that (like us), and the UI for selecting

[chromium-dev] Embedding chrome.pak in the chrome binary for Linux?

2009-12-12 Thread Satoru Takabayashi
The chrome binary for Linux seems to load resource bundles from a file named chrome.pak, while the resource booundles are embedded in the chrome DLL in other platforms (correct me if I'm wrong). This makes me wonder if it's a good idea to embed chrome.pak in the chrome binary for Linux. This would

Re: [chromium-dev] Embedding chrome.pak in the chrome binary for Linux?

2009-12-12 Thread Thomas Van Lenten
[From the right address this time] There is a pak file for each language, so you'd have in include all language pak files in the binary, and only one would be used at any given time, so there would be some overhead as far a memory, etc. TVL On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 7:52 AM, Satoru Takabayashi

Re: [chromium-dev] Re: [chromium-extensions] Re: Desktop Notifications

2009-12-12 Thread Aaron Boodman
Not implemented yet. I have a patch to make this work, but it needs somebody to volunteer to write tests for it and get it committed. Otherwise, it is backlogged behind 300 open bugs. - a On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Marcos Aruj marcos.a...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Bringing this topic back

Re: [chromium-dev] Embedding chrome.pak in the chrome binary for Linux?

2009-12-12 Thread Rahul Kuchhal
There are not embedded even on Windows (see 52 dlls under Google\Chrome\Application\version\Locales folder). On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:52 AM, Satoru Takabayashi sato...@chromium.orgwrote: The chrome binary for Linux seems to load resource bundles from a file named chrome.pak, while the

Re: [chromium-dev] Embedding chrome.pak in the chrome binary for Linux?

2009-12-12 Thread Satoru Takabayashi
Thank you for the feedback. I was thinking about embedding only chrome.pak, not language pak files, just like Windows has a DLL for each language. Satoru On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Rahul Kuchhal kuch...@chromium.org wrote: There are not embedded even on Windows (see 52 dlls under

Re: [chromium-dev] Embedding chrome.pak in the chrome binary for Linux?

2009-12-12 Thread Evan Martin
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:52 AM, Satoru Takabayashi sato...@chromium.org wrote: The chrome binary for Linux seems to load resource bundles from a file named chrome.pak, while the resource booundles are embedded in the chrome DLL in other platforms (correct me if I'm wrong). This makes me wonder