Right now a convenient way to see if a website is having problems due to
some extension's content script is to open an Incognito window. Would it
make sense to add a way to easily disable extensions in Incognito mode, like
a button in the Incognito window's Browser Actions area or something?
What if the Incognito profile started with a copy-on-write version of
extensions' localStorage? That way extensions in Incognito mode would see
the writes they just made, but changes would not persist beyond Incognito
mode.
Then we could either add the messaging API for Incognito - Regular
)
command line build does:
devenv.exe chrome.sln /Build Debug /Out C:\\tmp\\build.log /Project chrome
This worked fine until quite recently.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:18 AM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:01 PM, Antony Sargent asarg...@chromium.orgwrote:
I just
and 12/17.
2009/12/1 Antony Sargent asarg...@chromium.org:
I am currently scheduled to be on Build Sheriff duty 12/22 and 12/23, but
will be on vacation then. Anyone able to swap? Those days will probably
be
pretty low-volume, so really you'd be helping yourself. :)
--
Chromium
I just updated to revision 33425, and a clean build (manually deleted Debug
directory before opening .sln file) gives the following error in
service_runtime_x86. I'm running Visual Studio 2008 on Vista x64. Anyone
else seeing this, or know what might be the problem?
4-- Build started:
Also: will you be allowing extensions hosted on Google to have a custom
update URL? I'm guessing no, but thought I'd find out for sure.
Our plan has been for the gallery to just handle autoupdate for you. Any
reason you'd want to do it yourself? If it's for usage tracking purposes,
one
[+chromium-dev and dumi]
I'm not sure what our overall plan is with respect to quotas for html5
databases, and whether we've discussed giving extensions larger quotas than
regular web content. Dumi or anyone else care to comment?
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Yuichi Tateno
As we move closer to getting extensions enabled on the beta channel, we
wanted to summarize the current data we have on performance. The 3 sources
we have right now are startup tests, page cycler tests, and script injection
histograms.
Content scripts get injected with a separate isolated world
Sometime in the last day or two I noticed the following in my build output
in Visual Studio when linking chrome_dll:
LINK : warning LNK4044: unrecognized option
'/System/Library/Frameworks/IOKit.framework'; ignored
A gyp problem perhaps? Is anyone else seeing this?
Do we have anything running which monitors disk free space? It seems like in
a couple of cases over the last few months getting email alerts when a bot's
disk is 90% full might have helped alert Sheriffs/Troopers to a problem
earlier and possibly prevent a tree closure.
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at
Looks like we have a leak in render_thread_unittest.cc :
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/builders/XP%20Unit%20(purify)/builds/5386/steps/purify%20test:%20unit/logs/stdio
There are several distinct stacks, but most boil down to this allocation:
ipc/ipc_sync_channel.cc:347
, Antony Sargent asarg...@google.comwrote:
Looks like we have a leak in render_thread_unittest.cc :
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/builders/XP%20Unit%20(purify)/builds/5386/steps/purify%20test:%20unit/logs/stdio
There are several distinct stacks, but most boil down to this allocation
/developers/design-documents/extensions/history-api
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Antony Sargent asarg...@google.com wrote:
You can probably find the answer somewhere in
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/chrome/browser/history/
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/chrome
You can probably find the answer somewhere in
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/chrome/browser/history/
http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/trunk/src/chrome/browser/history/In
particular, it looks like visit_database.cc uses Time::ToInternalValue().
Have a look at:
To clarify, doesn't --enable-dcheck only work on chromium release builds you
built yourself and not official builds of Google Chrome?
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Scott Violet s...@chromium.org wrote:
One easy suggestion in helping catch bugs is to run Chrome with
--enable-dcheck .
Adam, speaking of garbage collection and content scripts, have you seen
http://crbug.com/17410?
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 2:17 AM, Adam Barth aba...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 2:12 AM, dwhdawag...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe as a side-effect of this, content scripts can no
I think I'd personally prefer the other page elements to remain in place,
but have their brightness dimmed down (the way Youtube/Hulu/etc. have a
turn down the lights feature - perhaps this is what Mike meant by
lightboxes?). For this to work well it would probably also have to stop
running flash
17 matches
Mail list logo
