On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 8:36 AM, Evan Martin ev...@google.com wrote:
Since the proposed vulnerability is that I have cd'ed into a specially
crafted malicious directory then type out google-chrome
some-particular-url, at which point I will end up at a file:// URL
under the attacker's control,
Hi,
I found this interesting: http://a.qoid.us/google.html
Because it's clearly very non-JavaScript focused (just a CSS rotation) and
yet the browsers exhibit very different performance characteristics.
All on my underpowered Windows laptop,
Chrome 3 4: smooth. Very nice anti-aliased accurate
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Chris Evans cev...@chromium.org wrote:
The other browsers do not support the CSS used / required for this demo.
There was a similar version, but using SVG animation to do something very
Hi,
In the absence of any objections, we'll update the guidelines to reflect the
edits below (in bold).
The focus here is to bring us inline with industry ratings (having spoken to
Microsoft and looking at Mozilla's guidelines). The key change is to rate
sandbox escape issues as High.
Cheers
There's also option 3)
Pre-fault the mmap()ed region in the file thread upon dictionary
initialization.
On Linux at least, that may give you better behaviour than malloc() + read()
in the event of memory pressure.
Cheers
Chris
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Evan Stade est...@chromium.org
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Brett Wilson bre...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Evan Stade est...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi all,
At its last meeting the jank task force discussed improving
responsiveness of the spellchecker but we didn't come to a solid
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Paweł Hajdan Jr.
phajdan...@chromium.orgwrote:
This is http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3073 . I think
it's not so hard to implement it (and probably not so high priority either),
but are there any potential security (or other) problems?
On Jul 14, 7:26 pm, Adam Langley a...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 7:18 PM, Jeremy Orlowjor...@chromium.org wrote:
Wait...so is this something every linux Chromium developer is going to have
to do forever?
You only need to do it once and, if you don't, you just run without a
On Jul 14, 12:23 pm, Jim Roskind j...@chromium.org wrote:
I tend to think incognito mode as a personal (and very private) decision.
As a result, I'd tend to prefer that it be very difficult to leak such
status further than absolutely necessary.
Any web page that wishes can determine if you
On Jun 24, 2:32 am, Fumitoshi Ukai (鵜飼文敏) u...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi,
yuzo, tyoshino and I start working to implement HTML5 Web Socket and write
design docs
WebKit part:http://docs.google.com/View?id=dfm7gfvg_0fpjg22gh
Chromium part:http://docs.google.com/View?id=dfm7gfvg_1dm97qxgm
On Jun 24, 2:32 am, Fumitoshi Ukai (鵜飼文敏) u...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi,
yuzo, tyoshino and I start working to implement HTML5 Web Socket and write
design docs
WebKit part:http://docs.google.com/View?id=dfm7gfvg_0fpjg22gh
Chromium part:http://docs.google.com/View?id=dfm7gfvg_1dm97qxgm
On Jun 24, 2:32 am, Fumitoshi Ukai (鵜飼文敏) u...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi,
yuzo, tyoshino and I start working to implement HTML5 Web Socket and write
design docs
WebKit part:http://docs.google.com/View?id=dfm7gfvg_0fpjg22gh
Chromium part:http://docs.google.com/View?id=dfm7gfvg_1dm97qxgm
12 matches
Mail list logo
