(Resending from chromium.org)
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
After reading the WebGL blog post today, and following the link to the wiki,
it struck me as fairly *bad* that we are telling people to disable the
sandbox. A good number of folks are going
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Kenneth Russell k...@chromium.org wrote:
(Resending from chromium.org)
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
After reading the WebGL blog post today, and following the link to the
wiki,
it struck me as fairly *bad* that we
Yes, a periodic inforbar would be swell and fairly effective. in my opinion.
☆PhistucK
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:57, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 1:10 AM, Kenneth Russell k...@chromium.org wrote:
(Resending from chromium.org)
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at
The goal is to annoy you so you will try to stop passing these arguments.
Don't we already have other infobars possibly showing at startup (e.g.,
restore tabs)?
-darin
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
I also like the infobar on start, especially if there's
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
The goal is to annoy you so you will try to stop passing these arguments.
Don't we already have other infobars possibly showing at startup (e.g.,
restore tabs)?
Yes. It looks a little silly -- you get two of them stacked
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
As for the info bar/modal dialog: I've been thinking for a bit, and I'm
not sure this is enough. We have plenty of data that shows users often
leave browsers open for a very long time. The main risk is that someone
As for the info bar/modal dialog: I've been thinking for a bit, and I'm
not sure this is enough. We have plenty of data that shows users often
leave browsers open for a very long time. The main risk is that someone
sets the flag, starts their browser, trys out the new cool feature, and then
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
I don't understand the argument for a periodic indicator. We don't have a
periodic indicator telling the user when to restart their browser to pick
up
auto-updates.
I don't think this is a fair comparison. One is a
But, as I understand, some people do use it due to issues with the sandbox,
real issues, system incompatibilities.
That would be really unfair towards them.
☆PhistucK
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 20:43, Glen Murphy g...@chromium.org wrote:
As for the info bar/modal dialog: I've been thinking for
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:01 AM, PhistucK phist...@gmail.com wrote:
But, as I understand, some people do use it due to issues with the sandbox,
real issues, system incompatibilities.
That would be really unfair towards them.
Most issues should be fixable. We need to hear about problems the
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Glen Murphy g...@chromium.org wrote:
As for the info bar/modal dialog: I've been thinking for a bit, and I'm
not sure this is enough. We have plenty of data that shows users often
leave browsers open for a very long time. The main risk is that someone
sets
[from right address]
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Steve VanDeBogart vand...@google.comwrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org wrote:
[[And now I'm waiting for someone to suggest the
--no-really-no-sandbox-i-like-being-insecure flag to suppress the
And then an infobar would show up (only in the first time) and tell them
they can be relieved since they are secure again? ;)
Sounds like an appropriate Google joke.
☆PhistucK
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 21:40, Steve VanDeBogart vand...@chromium.orgwrote:
[from right address]
On Fri, Dec 11,
13 matches
Mail list logo
