One comment regarding synchronous IPC (I presume this is from the extension process to the renderer\browser process): I agree that synchronous IPC is slower, and better to be async when possible. However, if it's used for APIs that aren't called frequently (100 calls/s, as opposed to thousands or ten thousands), it's not so bad. It'll keep the programming model easy, and the performance impact will be negligible.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Aaron Boodman <a...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/developers/design-documents/extensions/api-pattern > > I'm thinking about what the general pattern for the APIs we expose to > extensions should be. I've been leaning toward something that is quite > a bit of a departure from the style of the DOM and more idiomatic > JavaScript and more asynchronous. > > Feedback wanted. > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe: http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
