I think a getter of the form
const std::map& switches() const;
would be fine.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Book'em Dano wrote:
>
> For Chromium that may be the case, but there are other projects that
> are also using the CommandLine class that may/do have other reqs.
>
> On Jun 3, 5:02 am,
For Chromium that may be the case, but there are other projects that
are also using the CommandLine class that may/do have other reqs.
On Jun 3, 5:02 am, Thomas Van Lenten wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Book'em Dano wrote:
>
> > Does anyone have objections to including such a functio
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Book'em Dano wrote:
>
> Does anyone have objections to including such a function? It would
> just return a copy of std::map switches_;
>
> I'd like to add such a function so that I can iterate over the command
> line args (both switches and loose values) and valid
Sure. that woudl work too. I'm kinda curious why this was removed in
the first place. If i recall correctly, we used to have such a method.
On Jun 2, 9:09 pm, Amanda Walker wrote:
> Would an iterator method on CommandLine serve the same purpose? It seems
> like that could work without having to
Would an iterator method on CommandLine serve the same purpose? It seems
like that could work without having to make a copy...
--Amanda
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Book'em Dano wrote:
>
> Does anyone have objections to including such a function? It would
> just return a copy of std::map sw
