It's hard to say how much of the scheme-like language is supported.
There are some provided examples, but they all say things like "this
is an example, don't try to use it". In addition, several modules of
the TrustedBSD code aren't present (Apple hand-rolled several of their
own) so it's not like
> Definitely we would need a way to give more resources to the renderer
> after the process has been locked down. In windows we also have the
> fonts issue but we do a neat trick to get them working. That is to say
> that we should try hard to use the most restrictive setting ('pure
> computation'
Very interesting.
Definitely we would need a way to give more resources to the renderer
after the process has been locked down. In windows we also have the
fonts issue but we do a neat trick to get them working. That is to say
that we should try hard to use the most restrictive setting ('pure
com
Very interesting!
> As a result, this shouldn't impose any additional requirements or
drastically alter our IPC designs.
I'd actually be surprised if this didn't have a bearing on our IPC choice.
Afterall, the Windows IPC deals in DuplicateHandle, which is all about
exposing new resources to the