i use a tarball first,then try update to the latest.
btw, when i ran gclient sync, got those message
-running 'svn update F:\chromium\src' in 'F:\chromium'
At revision 11935
-running 'svn update F:\chromium\src/third_party/WebKit --revision
11916' in 'F:\chromium'
svn:Target path does not
rd /q /s f:\chromium\src\third_parth\Webkitgclient sync
gclient runhooks --force
that should do it.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 8:31 AM, zyn njred...@163.com wrote:
i use a tarball first,then try update to the latest.
btw, when i ran gclient sync, got those message
-running 'svn update
Thank you,everything back to normal!
On Mar 18, 8:43 pm, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@chromium.org wrote:
rd /q /s f:\chromium\src\third_parth\Webkitgclient sync
gclient runhooks --force
that should do it.
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 8:31 AM, zyn njred...@163.com wrote:
i use a tarball
Did this ever get resolved?I'd be eager to hear about any trouble with gyp.
-BradN
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Jim Roskind j...@chromium.org wrote:
Just a wild guess... please ignore if this is not applicable:
Any chance you pulled on Friday eve between 5pm and 8pm pacific time? If
It randomly happen on windows try slave every day.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 2:41 PM, Bradley Nelson bradnel...@google.comwrote:
Did this ever get resolved?I'd be eager to hear about any trouble with
gyp.
-BradN
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Jim Roskind j...@chromium.org wrote:
Just a
I think I see what's happening.maruel, do I understand correctly that the
trybot syncs to the revision the patch is based on before applying it? It
looks like when folks with patchs prior to the base-gyp switch do a try,
that it rolls things back, which doesn't work right.
If folks sync before try
The problem with that list is that we alternately generate the sln
files (from gyp), and then try to update and revert them via svn. The
remnant files generated by gyp screw up the process :-(.
To make it all work in the interim, you need to add step between 1 and 2 that:
1a) Delete sln and
Jim Roskind wrote:
The problem with that list is that we alternately generate the sln
files (from gyp), and then try to update and revert them via svn. The
remnant files generated by gyp screw up the process :-(.
OK, that's bad. I thought Brad took steps to ensure that we'd either
generate
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Mark Mentovai m...@chromium.org wrote:
Marc-Antoine Ruel wrote:
They are not svn:ignored.
OK, anything that's GYP-generated does need to be in svn:ignore.
Not understanding why?
One of the thing I'm afraid of is that even if a
generated .vcproj is
Bradley Nelson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Mark Mentovai m...@chromium.org wrote:
OK, anything that's GYP-generated does need to be in svn:ignore.
Not understanding why?
The try servers clean out previous state with gclient revert, which
will remove any file that shows up as ? in
Bradley Nelson wrote:
It certainly was my intention to have atomic changes that remove sln/vcprojs
in the same change that causes them to be generated.
Did you mean something stronger Mark?
Nope, that's exactly what I meant and all of the changelists I saw
from you did do this. It seems that
How did you get the code? Tarball? Svn? Gclient?
Nicolas
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 2:38 AM, zyn njred...@163.com wrote:
Can't build the latest chrome,what's wrong with it.I use vs2005 to
open the chrome.sln,it complains a lot of vcproj file missing.When
build the solution,it failed.I was
Need to run GPY as Bradley mentioned before? I did not try the latest build.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Bradley Nelson bradnel...@google.com
wrote:
Hi All,
I've just rolled out a switchover of several components on Windows to
gyp (generate your project),
the new cross platform build tool
Just a wild guess... please ignore if this is not applicable:
Any chance you pulled on Friday eve between 5pm and 8pm pacific time? If
so, you might have gotten your tree a little wedged. When you do a gclient
sync, does it skip any of the files because there is a gyp generated file
in the way
14 matches
Mail list logo
