[chromium-dev] Re: sheriffs: please keep the purify bots green

2009-03-19 Thread Erik Kay
+yurys Thanks for tracking this one down, Alpha. Yury, I think the remaining error is yours (from http://codereview.chromium.org/42233 at r11855). Erik On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Alpha (Hin-Chung) Lam hc...@google.com wrote: Found the root in

[chromium-dev] Re: sheriffs: please keep the purify bots green

2009-03-18 Thread Marc-Antoine Ruel
Oh thanks, this week (including today) I've just barely tried to keep the tree compilable. From http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/waterfall?builder=XP%20Unit%20(purify)last_time=1237303917, it's hard to say.It could be anywhere from 11801 to 11818. ben, jam, agl, dkegel, hclam, levin,

[chromium-dev] Re: sheriffs: please keep the purify bots green

2009-03-18 Thread Adam Langley
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@chromium.org wrote: It could be anywhere from 11801 to 11818. ben, jam, agl, dkegel, hclam, levin, tc, pkasting checked in during that time frame. ager, sgk did non-code changes so I don't think it's them. We'll soon make the tree

[chromium-dev] Re: sheriffs: please keep the purify bots green

2009-03-18 Thread Dean McNamee
It looks similar to: http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/builders/XP%20Unit%20(purify)/builds/2466/steps/purify%20test:%20unit/logs/stdio Which is what caused hclam's patch to reverted previously. On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Adam Langley a...@chromium.org wrote: On Wed, Mar 18,