I started working on upstreaming the rebaseline tool, which is part of the
plan for upstreaming layout tests in Q1.
On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Eric Seidel wrote:
> Once we have this sort of tool for webkit.org then those of us who
> work on webkit.org could just add the new baselines when w
Once we have this sort of tool for webkit.org then those of us who
work on webkit.org could just add the new baselines when we commit the
patches in the first place. :)
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Julie Parent wrote:
> Yeah, me too.
> This is what tends to lead to me spending the day after my
Yeah, me too.
This is what tends to lead to me spending the day after my gardening
rotation doing clean up. Maybe if we had 2 people gardening at the same
time they could do this real time, but on a normal day, I think it is too
much for one person.
This tool is awesome though!
Julie
On Fri, J
Same here.
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Drew Wilson wrote:
> Do you find that you have time to figure out if rebaselining a test is the
> right thing to do while you're actively gardening? Maybe I just work too
> slowly, but I often find that if I'm trying to rebaseline on the fly, it
> requi
Do you find that you have time to figure out if rebaselining a test is the
right thing to do while you're actively gardening? Maybe I just work too
slowly, but I often find that if I'm trying to rebaseline on the fly, it
requires that I do at least *some* investigation of the test failure to make
s
Before heading out for the weekend, I just want to mention this:
rebaseline tool really, really rocks. And yesterday I discovered an
option that I, to my shame, hadn't seen before: -w. This option pulls
baselines from the canary. It's like getting test expectations from
the future!
In other words,
