http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roc/archives/2009/06/stupid_x_tricks.html
Worth a read by folks working on the Linux port, in case the idea is useful
to us.
PK
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives,
nbsp;I began to read chromium's source codes, and got caught in these trival
questions:
1. what's gfx? I always see that.
2. what's the usage of .gyp files?
3.Is gmock used to help automation test? What else does chrome use for
automation test? I'm curious about that.
4.gcapi confused me, what
You could answer a lot of these questions yourself, with a little bit
of digging or a Google search. I'll try to give you a boost though.
2009/6/15 sitan2...@sina.com:
I began to read chromium's source codes, and got caught in these trival
questions:
1. what's gfx? I always see that.
Thanks Adam!
Before we start creating a list, we should think of a procedure that will
make sure it is kept up-to-date. It makes no sense if we create the list now
only to find that a year from now, when we need it, it's outdated.
The two most important questions to me at this point are:
- Were
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 3:59 AM, Dean McNameede...@chromium.org wrote:
Is there a design document or anything somewhere?
Adam wrote one:
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/LinuxZygote
- Dan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list:
This isn't an issue that I've heard of yet...
Can you post a few more details such as which file (or files) is failing the
compile?
-Albert
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 4:01 PM, nakro yoav.zilberb...@gmail.com wrote:
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\include\tuple(498) :
error
I'm hitting the exact same issue as nakro. I did a sync this morning (tree
was green) and did a clean build of chrome.exe.
I'm at this point officially giving up on Visual Studio 2008 and
going back to VS2005.
Sverrir
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Albert J. Wong (王重傑)
Hi albret,
projects that fail :
gmockj
gmockmain
here is an example out from gmockmain
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\include\tuple(498) :
error C2065: '_Is_swap_move' : undeclared identifier
1C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\include\tuple
(504) : see
5.mini_installer.exe and setup.exe? I can't execute them. What're they
used for?Try reading the source code - it has actually a lot of useful
comments. Such as mini_installer.cc has comments on how mini_installer and
setup relate.
If you can't run them you might be hitting an issue some of us
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:03 AM, nakro yoav.zilberb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi albret,
projects that fail :
gmockj
gmockmain
here is an example out from gmockmain
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\include\tuple(498) :
error C2065: '_Is_swap_move' : undeclared identifier
1
I'm fine with that if necessary.
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Albert J. Wong
(王重傑)ajw...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:03 AM, nakro yoav.zilberb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi albret,
projects that fail :
gmockj
gmockmain
here is an example out from gmockmain
C:\Program
2009/6/15 sitan2...@sina.com
I began to read chromium's source codes, and got caught in these trival
questions:
1. what's gfx? I always see that.
2. what's the usage of .gyp files?
3.Is gmock used to help automation test? What else does chrome use for
automation test? I'm curious about
Posting so others can benefit.
Last week I started getting this error and haven't been able to find a way
to get around it:
$ gclient sync
svn: Working copy 'C:\cygwin\home\scherkus\depot_tools' locked
svn: run 'svn cleanup' to remove locks (type 'svn help cleanup' for details)
svn: Working copy
Hi All,
The TestShell::Navigate() method contains the following comment and code:
// Restore focus to the main frame prior to loading new request.
// This makes sure that we don't have a focused iframe. Otherwise, that
// iframe would keep focus when the SetFocus called immediately after
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:16 AM, Berend-Jan Weverskyli...@chromium.org wrote:
Before we start creating a list, we should think of a procedure that will
make sure it is kept up-to-date. It makes no sense if we create the list now
only to find that a year from now, when we need it, it's
Thanks all for the input.
I've successfully implemented basic spellchecking using the OSX
spellchecker, although the implementation is a bit untested, so I'm trying
to get that cleaned up a little bit before moving any more forward. As for
keeping hunspell or not, I've left it there, it isn't
TestShell is a bit of a mess. I wouldn't be surprised at all if
SetFocusedFrame is not called where it should be.
That old internal bug mentions these layout tests:
editing\pasteboard\testcase-9507.html
editing\pasteboard\undoable-fragment-removes.html
editing\pasteboard\unrendered-br.html
I was afraid this would turn out to be difficult. Is there any way we might
be able to diff what parts of the code get compiled in the different builds
and auto generate a list? #defines might make this list rather long, but we
may be able to go through the list once and identify known differences
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
TestShell is a bit of a mess. I wouldn't be surprised at all if
SetFocusedFrame is not called where it should be.
That old internal bug mentions these layout tests:
editing\pasteboard\testcase-9507.html
19 matches
Mail list logo
