If you get a compile error in installer_util on Windows after syncing
to r36033, try deleting
chrome/build/obj/global_intermediate/installer_util_strings folder or
manual rebuild on chrome_strings project.
Rahul
--
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives,
From the right email address this time.
If you really want to hack it, I think the below steps would work but there
are some many corner cases in the install flow, I am not sure if it will
always work.
- Change
There are not embedded even on Windows (see 52 dlls under
Google\Chrome\Application\version\Locales folder).
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 4:52 AM, Satoru Takabayashi sato...@chromium.orgwrote:
The chrome binary for Linux seems to load resource bundles from a file
named chrome.pak, while the
Yes Windows installer relies on this behavior. There are installer_unittests
which might cover this particular use case (in CopyTreeWorkItemTest) but I
am not sure.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Steven Knight s...@chromium.org wrote:
Our existing unit tests for file_util::CopyDirectory() do
AFAIK no one is working on it for Linux.
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Jeremy Moskovich jer...@chromium.orgwrote:
I'm looking at splitting the First Run UI import machinery into it's own
process on OS X.
I just wanted to sync up with people working on the Linux side of things to
make
I thought to:user and -cc:user would work in this case? Have you tried
using that in Has the words on Filter edit screen?
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Brett Wilson bre...@chromium.org wrote:
I added myself to some watchlists and I get a bunch of email about a
lot of reviews
But this has
Not sure why you are getting error when setup.exe gets launched but to get
around it you can launch Chrome as admin, set it as default and then exit.
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 12:11 AM, nakro yoav.zilberb...@gmail.com wrote:
setting chromium as the default browser make it invoke setup.exe
the
A few of these, where root cause is the same (leaking of tasks, for example
11462, 6, 11144 among others) should get fixed once
http://codereview.chromium.org/115328 gets committed.
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
And the award goes to...
% git log
If file structure on Linux is anywhere like Windows than the shared library
(chrome.dll on Windows) would be versioned (the dll is kept inside a version
directory on Windows) but the executable itself (chrome.exe) will always
live at the same place.
On Linux are we going to allow Chrome updates to
vs exec ? I
don't want us to paint ourselves in a corner when we implement the
sandbox.
On Feb 5, 9:57 am, Rahul Kuchhal kuch...@chromium.org wrote:
If file structure on Linux is anywhere like Windows than the shared
library
(chrome.dll on Windows) would be versioned (the dll
10 matches
Mail list logo
