On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Amanda Walker ama...@chromium.org wrote:
But the problem is : where are the count-numbers of files?
There is no explicit count. As WebKit parses HTML, we queue up requests for
resources that are encountered in that HTML. We only know we're done when
there
Evan Martin wrote:
But if it were possible to make a progress bar that browser developers
thought would be meaningful, they would have been integrated into
browsers already.
The bar part of a progress bar is usually useless. What's nice is
being able to see that things are actually getting
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Viet-Trung Luu viettrung...@gmail.com wrote:
I feel like the throbber should somehow indicate that things are
actually being loaded (as opposed to hanging, waiting for something
which may never complete). Maybe it already does that and I haven't
noticed
Well, I agree with PhistucK. I think a progress bar may help though it's not
so accurate.
By the way, if I want to add such a bar with chromium, how should I start?
Is there a method that tells the size of the resources to be loaded and the
size of the resources already loaded?
2009/9/29 Peter
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 11:01, Jickae Davis jick...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I agree with PhistucK. I think a progress bar may help though it's
not so accurate.
By the way, if I want to add such a bar with chromium, how should I start?
Is there a method that tells the size of the resources to
3x,Paweł .
I'm not trying to debug slow-loading pages. I'm reading chromium's src codes
and wondering how to add a loading-progress bar based on chromium.
Maybe I will to give a try to add such a bar.
2009/10/9 Paweł Hajdan Jr. phajdan...@chromium.org
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 11:01, Jickae Davis
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 5:01 AM, Jickae Davis jick...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I agree with PhistucK. I think a progress bar may help though it's
not so accurate.
By the way, if I want to add such a bar with chromium, how should I start?
Is there a method that tells the size of the resources to
As I understand it, you are talking about adding an overall progress bar for
page loading and showing the progress bar somewhere in the Chrome UI.
If that is the case, then bear in mind that you need buy-in from the UX team
before you add the UI element to the Chromium codebase. I know we left out
No--there is in fact no way to determine that in advance. Each resource
can reference other resources, and even for a single resource we often don't
know what size it is until we finish loading it.
We could provide a dynamically-updating bar with a fraction of
As I understand it, you are talking about adding an overall progress bar
for page loading and showing the progress bar somewhere in the Chrome UI.
yes, I'm interested in chromium.
If that is the case, then bear in mind that you need buy-in from the UX
team before you add the UI element to
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 10:28 PM, Jickae Davis jick...@gmail.com wrote:
No--there is in fact no way to determine that in advance. Each resource
can reference other resources, and even for a single resource we often don't
know what size it is until we finish loading it.
We could provide a
Just a guess, but I think it's because progress bars are misleading.
If you show a bar for just the progress on the HTML, you reach 100%
before the page even displays right; if you wait for all subresources
to load, you will hover below 100% as large images or slow
subresources load (you ever
Yeah, but some indication will be helpful, even the one IE has been giving -
## images downloading or something. A count down for resources, even if
the resource count changes every few seconds, it is still preferable against
being lost in the dark in some way.
Do you not agree?
☆PhistucK
On
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:21 PM, PhistucK phist...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, but some indication will be helpful, even the one IE has been giving -
## images downloading or something. A count down for resources, even if
the resource count changes every few seconds, it is still preferable against
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Mike Pinkerton pinker...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:21 PM, PhistucK phist...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, but some indication will be helpful, even the one IE has been giving -
Do you not agree?
I do not agree.
I agree with pinkerton. This is
15 matches
Mail list logo
