On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 5:09 PM, David Levin le...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org wrote:
I'm sorry for introducing this pattern in base::Thread. It's bitten
use several times over the course of the project. If you see a better
design, please don't hesitate to fix it.
Adam
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
I've spent a good deal of this
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
I've spent a good deal of this week trying to track down what turned out to
be a simple but fairly common problem: I forgot virtual dispatch only
partially works in destructors. There have been several email threads
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.orgwrote:
I've spent a good deal of this week trying to track down what turned out
Just to be clear for those of us who are wobbly on C++, this is
because during the constructor or destructor, your object is of the
class in question, NOT of the class it will finally be, because in the
constructor the subclass has not been constructed, yet, and in the
destructor the subclass was
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org wrote:
Just to be clear for those of us who are wobbly on C++, this is
because during the constructor or destructor, your object is of the
class in question, NOT of the class it will finally be, because in the
constructor the
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org wrote:
Just to be clear for those of us who are wobbly on C++, this is
because during the constructor or destructor, your object is of the
class in question, NOT of the class it will finally be, because in the
constructor the
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org wrote:
Just to be clear for those of us who are wobbly on C++, this is
because during the constructor or destructor, your object is of the
class in question,
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org wrote:
Just to be clear for those of us who are wobbly on C++, this is
because during the constructor or destructor, your object is of the
class in
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Antoine Labour pi...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org wrote:
Just to be clear for those of us who are wobbly on C++, this is
because
10 matches
Mail list logo
